Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />- <br />.:_.,-"..,:,~,..- .~~.. - <br />~"'"~ ~.~ <br /> <br />- <br />~ <br /> <br />T dble 11-13.-Summary of Impacts and comparison 01 resourcelissues <br /> <br />~ <br />~ <br />lil' <br />... <br />:::: <br /> <br /> Impacts I <br /> Proposed Planl <br /> Phase I <br />Resource No Actlon 1980 FES Plan A I B Phase II <br /> <br />Wat.r r..ourc.. Existing trends would Average annual depletion Average annual depletion Average annual depletion Average annual depletion <br /> continue. to the San Juan River of to the San Juan River of to the San Juan Rlyer of to the San Juan River of <br /> 154.800 acre-Ieet. 57.100 acre-feet. 128.600 acre-Ieel. 149,200 acre-Ieet. <br />Coer-bed methane gas No impacts. None identified. Would Temporary Increased Same Indirect Impacts 8S Same fndlrect Impacts as <br /> be sImilar to those seepage of methane gas. described lor Phase I. descr1bed for Phase I, <br /> impacts Identified fOf Indirect Impacts to Stage A. StageA. <br /> Proposed Plan. infrastructure construction <br /> relsling to adjacent <br /> methane gas production. <br />Coal development No impacts. Additional dewatering No impacts. Minor Impacts as a result Same as described for <br /> would be requlrad In mine of construction of Project 1980 FES Plan, <br /> pits. Connict with features. <br /> recreation at Southern <br /> Ute Reservoir. <br />Soli re.ource. Similar farming practices Some Project lands high No Impacts. High selenium Project Same as Phase I. Stage B. <br /> would continue, Addl. In selenium which would lands eliminated. Return <br /> tional development could Impact return flow quality. flews similar to present <br /> occur. conditions. <br />Water quality <br />Animas River Existing trends would Same as described for No measurable Increases Minimal Increases In Same as Phase I, Stage B. <br /> continue, Proposed Plan. In selenium concentration. selenium concentration. <br /> "..~ <br /> <br />_ir~ - , ., -, .._~.."". .." . "'~'~-,--... ~.'..' ..,.., .. <br />