Laserfiche WebLink
<br />014'1 <br /> <br />~ The study, was divided into two phases, with Phase I presenting a <br />description of potential alternatives evaluated in the <br />specific context of the Ft. Lyon area, and Phase II developing a <br />detailed implementation plan for one or more of the alternatives. <br />After completion of Phase I a preliminary report will be presented <br />to the Board, the Ft. Lyon Canal Co., its shareholders, the Lower <br />Arkansas River Commission, and interested member of the public. <br />The most promising alternative (s) will be then chosen through <br />discussion for detailed study in Phase II. <br /> <br />The study outline was <br />parties and groups and <br />study/Request for Proposal <br /> <br />reviewed with the following interested <br />developed into the final Plan of <br />(POS/RFP) for the project: <br /> <br />4) <br />5) <br /> <br />Lower Arkansas River Commission (LARC), August 12, 1992 <br />LARC Ft. Lyon coordinating subcommittee, August 27, 1992 <br />Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District, <br />August 20, 1992 <br />Ft. Lyon Canal Co., Board of Directors, August 26, 1992 <br />Ft. Lyon Ownership of Water, Inc (FLOW), August 26, 1992 <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />1) <br />2) <br />3) <br /> <br />Confering with LARC and FLOW provided access to representatives of <br />Task Force II, as well as those people who had volunteered in <br />February 1992 to work with Governor Romer on Ft. Lyon transfer <br />issues. <br /> <br />The final POS/RFP, after approval by the Board, was used in <br />the consultant selection process as explained below. The POS/RFP <br />is attached hereto as Exhibit 1. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />3 <br />