My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP04621
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
WSP04621
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:14:53 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:27:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8407.500
Description
Missouri River basin Comprehensive Framework Study-Volume 1- Report
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
12/1/1971
Author
Missouri Basin Inter
Title
Missouri River Basin Comprehensive Framework Study - Volume I - Report
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
286
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />absorption was nol sufficiently great 10 allow total <br />employment in the region to keep pace with the total <br />national increase. Most of the manufacturing has <br />remained in the large metropolitan areas, with Denver, <br />Kansas City, Omaha, and Sioux City accounting for 70 <br />percent or more of the lotal manufacturing. For the <br />region's cities of 10,000 to 50,000 population, there has <br />been some progress in attracting manufacturing in recent <br />years. The most helpful trend has been decentralization <br />in the food processing industries. Industries such as meat <br />packing Jre becoming more oriented to smaller plants <br />located closer to the sources of their raw materials. Also, <br />there has been a smaU influx of light industry. such as <br />machinery fabrication and elecrronks. Even though the <br />growth of manufacturing has been good in some of the <br />medium-sized cities, the growth in smaller ones has been <br />rather sporadic. The plains portion of the region has <br />been particularly slow in attracting new industries. <br />The "other commodity" segment of the economy. <br />including mining and contract construction. has not <br />been growing at i1 particularly fast pace. Within the <br />mining segment, the fuels industries experienced the <br />slowest employment growth while enjoying substantial <br />production increases. Contractural construction is tied <br />to the general welfare of (he u(her eCll/lOIlliL' segments <br />and their growth. Again, the large metropolitan areas <br />have dominated this segment. This is 10 be expected for <br />they have had the greatest population and industrial <br />growth rates within the region. <br />The most rapidly expanding sector of the economy <br />and the one which accounts for the largest proportion of <br />employment. both nationally and jn the region. is the <br />noncommodity-prut..!ucing group_ In 1940, over 1.1 <br />million persons were employed in this segment, which <br />amounted to just over half of Ihe total employment in <br />all segments of the economy. By 1960, the non- <br />commodity-producing employment had increased to 1.8 <br />million, accounting for 61.8 percent of the total <br />employment in the region. <br />The noncommodity sector typically is composed of <br />labor-intensive industries of the trade and servil:e v<lriety <br />which depend largely upon the wealth produced by the <br />more basic segments of the economy. such as agriculture <br />ant..! mallufacturing. Only when nOllcomlllodity <br />industries are supported by money created oulside the <br />region, such as by the tourism business, do they add to <br />the region's economy and can be considered basic to the <br />local economy. At other times, they simply represent <br />the reexpenditure of wealth created by some other <br />industry within the region: thus, they are in a large part <br />dependent upon the economic wealth of the rest of the <br />region's economy. These are the industries that <br />domina Ie the economic bases of the smaller cities :.lI1d <br />towns. <br />Even though the government and military employ- <br />ment category has h<1d the largest percentage increase. <br /> <br />34 <br /> <br />the trade category predolIllllates and has matched it in <br />terlllS of an increase of 100,000 workers in the <br />1950-1960 decade. In the same time period, the service <br />category has increased by some 163,500 workers. One of <br />the nwjor reasons for the increase in Ihe trades and <br />services has been a boom in the tourist industry during <br />the lasl few years. <br />There has been widespread mteresl within the region <br />in attracting the tourist dollar. In some favored locations <br />tourism is the primary induslry and in many other areas <br />it is second only to agriculture. Tourism has become a <br />particularly important source of income for many of the <br />small towns and cities. Consequently. Ihere have been a <br />number of concerted effurts to develop the scenic, <br />hunting, and fishing potentials and to provide the <br />services needed by the tourist. In some areas of the <br />region this industry has probably the greatest potential <br />for future growth and it is expected to become <br />increasingly important. The one serious shortcoming of <br />the water-orienled re(:reation sector of the tourisl <br />industry. particularly in the norlhE'rn porljons of the <br />region. is the relatively short seasonal activity which <br />parallels the peak seasonal demand for workers in the <br />agricultural and contract construction industries. <br />llowe\r'er, dependence of the majority of the region's <br />workers on the noncommodity-producing industries has <br />not been a total blessing. Historically, their wages have <br />been well beluw the Nation's average. Thus, the growth <br />of this segment of the region's economy has not had as <br />great an impacl 3S the numbers employed would <br />indicate. The lower salaries paid Illean that the region <br />cannot effectively compete with other areas of the <br />Nation for the trained worker, either in manufacturing <br />or in the trades and servkes. Consequently, many of the <br />most skilled people do nol stay in the regiun, but <br />migra Ie to other areas. <br />The distribution of total employment. and the four <br />major employment divisions of e<lch subregion for 1940, <br />1950. and 1960, are shown in figure i4. Employment in <br />the region is concentrated in the southern four sub. <br />regions. In 1960, these four subregions accounted for <br />1.4 million employees, or about 81.6 percent of the <br />region total. <br /> <br />INCOME AND EARNINGS <br /> <br />The total increase in real personal income for the <br />'region between 1940 and 1960 amounted to approxi- <br />mately $8_1 billion doilars_ Along with a growth in <br />population, increases in personal per capita income <br />during the 1940-1950 period amounted to 69_9 percent <br />and showed only 16.3 percent increase during the <br />following decade. For the same time periods total <br />earnings in the region increased by $3.9 and $2.1 billion <br />respectively. comparable to the national rate of increase. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.