My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP04460
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
WSP04460
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:55:34 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:22:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8281.980
Description
Colorado River Studies and Investigations - Upper Gunnison/Uncompahgre Basin Water Study
Basin
Gunnison
Water Division
4
Date
11/1/1988
Title
Phase I Feasibility Study for Upper Gunison-Uncompahgre Basin -- Task Memorandum No. 6
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />"':l <br /> <br />~ <br />c '~) <br />r-) <br />00 <br /> <br />Municipal and Industrial (M&I) Demand - it was assumed in the hydrologic <br />computer modeling of the basin that the City of Gunnison would develop <br />existing conditional water rights in the future. Based on that <br />assumption and the currently available supply in Ridgway Reservoir, no <br />M&I water shortages were identified in the study area. <br /> <br />Agricultural Demands - the same model noted above identified irrigation <br />shortages in eight sub-basins within the study area. <br /> <br />Streamflow - instream flow demand was defined as the decreed CWCB <br />instream flow rights in the study area. The hydrologic model results <br />indicate relatively frequent deficiencies on lower Ohio Creek, lower <br />Tomichi Creek and on Cochetopa Creek upstream of Los Pinos Creek. <br />Deficiencies were noted on many other streams but they were either <br />infrequent or were ofa smaller magnitude. <br /> <br />IDENTIFICATION AND SCREENING OF PLAN COMPONENTS <br /> <br />Both structural and non-structural components were considered as a means <br />of satisfying future consumptive use water demands. Recreation-related <br />components were also considered as a means of meeting the project objective of <br />enhancing the local economy. Individual components that were determined to be <br />most attractive were used to formulate alternative plans. <br /> <br />A number of water management and conservation measures were evaluated as <br />potent i a 1 non-structural means of sat i sfyi ng future water demands . Although <br />it may appear that agricultural demands can be reduced through .more efficient <br />irrigation practices, most of the water that appears to be diverted <br />unnecessarily actually returns to the stream within one month and is available <br />for other uses. It was also determined. that such non-structural measures were <br />generally not practical in the agricultural sector. because of economic or <br />legal considerations. The M&I sector in the study area presently accounts for <br />I ess than 1. 5 percent of the tot a 1 consumpt ive use in the study area. Any <br />savings achieved through conservation and/or improved management of M&I water <br />supplies would therefore have practically no impact on reducing the overall <br /> <br />S-2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.