My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP04440
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
WSP04440
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:55:29 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:19:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.111.A
Description
Central Utah Participating Project
State
UT
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
5/1/1984
Author
USDOI-BOR
Title
Diamond Fork Power System
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />2. Construction labor supply will be adequate to provide skilled and <br />unskilled tradesmen necessasry to construct the facilities. There will <br />be no strikes or significant shortages or delays in receipt of mate- <br />rials or equipment. <br /> <br />3. All necessary permits, licenses and approvals will be obtained on a <br />timely basis. <br /> <br />Advances would be required based upon a schedule of estimated expenditures. <br />Reclamation will seek budget contract authority which essentially permits an <br />agency to write its own appropriation within limits set in the legislation, <br />for normal appropri ated funds as well as revolving funds. Project <br />financing participants would be guaranteed that the Federal Government is <br />committed to funding its portion of the project on a timely basis. In <br />turn, project participants must be bound to maintain their level of funding <br />as advances come due or payment for sunk joint costs come due. <br /> <br />Financing Alternatives <br /> <br />Financing Diamond Fork costs may be accomplished individually by partici- <br />pants or by an agency or multiple agencies set up for that purpose dependent <br />upon the participant mix. For illustration purp~ses. we have structured a <br />representative tax-exempt bond financing program._' <br /> <br />Methodo logy <br /> <br />This analysis is based upon the estimated costs for generation and trans- <br />mission facil ities. These costs would be expended through 1993 and the <br />final un;'; is anticipated to be on line on October 1, 1993. This non- <br />Federal funding is assumed to be on a tax-exempt basis, with 50 percent <br />ot construction costs funded initially with long-term bonds and 50 percent <br />with tax-exempt commercial paper (T.E.C.P.) with the T.E.C.P. being refi- <br />nanced with long-term bonds shortly after the project is on 1 ine. The <br />joint costs which have already been incurred are assumed to be repaid to <br />the Government over 40 years at an interest rate of 3.222 percent through <br />a repayment contract arrangement. <br /> <br />:1 <br /> <br />Assumptions <br /> <br />General <br /> <br />The inn ation rate is assumed to be 5 percent annually over the construc- <br />tion period. Long-term bonds and commercial paper are issued 1 year ahead <br />of scheduled construction expenditures as shown in Table 5. <br /> <br />1/ The non-Federal financing adjunct committee of investment bankers and <br />bond counsel which is composed of Mr. Dick Christensen, Prudenti al Bache <br />Securities; Burrows Smith Division, Mr. Fenn Putman; Salomon Brothers, <br />Inc., Mr. Don Larson; Smith Barney, Harris Upham, and Company; and Mr. Bob <br />Ferdon of Mudge, Rose, Guthrie, Alexander, and Ferdon developed this bond <br />financing example in concert with the Reclamation and Western. <br /> <br />27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.