Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ra <br />(" <br /> <br />~, <br />1~~1 <br />~~~ <br /> <br />SUMMARY (Continued) <br /> <br />:p <br />~:f; <br /> <br />Alternatives <br /> <br />Beneficial Use <br /> <br />f~ <br /> <br />The alternatives were studied in three distinct formulations. <br />Nine preliminary alternative plans were developed in the first <br />formulation. For reformulation, no individual alternative from <br />the original nine was retained; however, certain features of some <br />of the plans were utilized to form six reformulated alternatives. <br />To account for the anticipated sequence of future water <br />acquisition by industrial users and the economic uncertainties in <br />the area, three alternative future conditions were analyzed which <br />in turn led to the formulation of six alternatives. Of the six, <br />only three alternatives were felt to be viable at the time. <br /> <br />Alternative I-Chevron proposed development of 7,000 acre-feet of <br />water annually for Chevron Chemical Company to meet part of its <br />total 13,700 acre-foot requirement. A well field would be <br />installed in the Big Bend area to provide water to a 41.2 mile <br />pressurized pipeline which would run southeast to a fertilizer <br />plant. Development of this plan would result in a salt load <br />reduction to the Colorado River of 52,700 tons annually at a cost <br />of $71 per ton. <br /> <br />Alternative 2-Chevron and Texasgulf (Bone Draw) proposed <br />development of 12,000 acre-feet of water to supply both Chevron <br />and Texasgulf. Well fields would be developed in both the Big <br />Bend and Bone Draw areas to provide water to a single a-mile <br />pressurized pipeline which would run south of the well fields. <br />From this point the pipeline would diverge into 35-mile and <br />23-mile branch lines to Chevron and Texasgulf, respectively. <br />This alternative would result in a salt load reduction in the <br />Colorado River of 64,200 tons annually at a cost of $96 per ton. <br /> <br />:r;: <br />~,~ <br />","' <br />",^ <br />:-~:~ <br /> <br />Alternative 6-Chevron and Texasgulf (without Bone Draw) is <br />essentially the same as alternative 2 except wells in the Bone <br />Draw area were deleted from the plan and the number of wells in <br />the Big Bend area increased to provide 12,000 acre-feet annually. <br />The salt load reduction in the Colorado River would be reduced by <br />77,300 tons annually with this alternative at a cost of <br />approximately $70 per ton. The cost analysis of the three <br />alternatives together with alternative future condition 1, is <br />shown in summary table 1. <br /> <br />;.X' <br />", <br />; ~; <br /> <br />Chevron Chemical Company constructed only phase 1 of their <br />phosphate fertilizer plant and indicated they did not plan to use <br />Big Sandy saline water in the first two phases of construction. <br />Texasgulf postponed expansion of their trona plant indefinitely <br /> <br />,~ <br />f-.~:-' . <br />~"j; <br /> <br />S-5 <br /> <br />l'"'' I 1 r' 'u" <br />J~. f..... <br />