|
<br />SUMMARY (Continued)
<br />
<br />Summary table 1.--Viable alternatives
<br />
<br />f~
<br />~~.
<br />
<br />~
<br />ilil
<br />
<br />r:
<br />~
<br />
<br />Features
<br />
<br />Alter-
<br />native
<br />future
<br />condi-
<br />tion 1
<br />
<br />1
<br />
<br />2
<br />Chevron
<br />Texas-
<br />gulf
<br />with
<br />Bone Draw
<br />
<br />Chevron
<br />
<br />)!
<br />W-.~
<br />:.':;jl
<br />...
<br />
<br />6
<br />Chevron
<br />Texas-
<br />gulf
<br />without
<br />Bone Draw
<br />
<br />--'>--
<br />ri:'
<br />~
<br />
<br />Water supply (acre feet/year)
<br />Chevron
<br />Texasgulf
<br />Total
<br />Depletion (acre feet/year)
<br />Salt reductIon (tons/year)
<br />Project features and cost'
<br />Collection system
<br />Green River pump station
<br />Collector well field
<br />Conveyance system
<br />Green River pipeline
<br />Green River pumping plant
<br />Regulating reservoirs
<br />Big Sandy pipeline
<br />Big Sandy pumping plant
<br />Transmission lines,
<br />access roads
<br />Permanent operating
<br />facility
<br />Environmental mitigation
<br />Total
<br />Less pre-authorized cost
<br />Subtotal
<br />Interest during construction4
<br />Total investment
<br />Annual cost Amortized investment'
<br />Annual OM&R
<br />Total
<br />Effect at Imperial Dam (mg/L)'
<br />Cost effectiveness'
<br />
<br />13, 700
<br />5,000
<br />18,700
<br />18,700
<br />9,400
<br />
<br />$1,728
<br />
<br />14,704
<br />1,467
<br />2,772
<br />
<br />1,410
<br />
<br />64
<br />22,145
<br />
<br />22,145
<br />1,800
<br />$23,945
<br />1,946
<br />1,514
<br />3,460
<br />+1.4
<br />
<br />'7,000
<br />
<br />7,000
<br />7,000
<br />52,700
<br />
<br />'7,000
<br />5,000
<br />12,000
<br />12,000
<br />64,200
<br />
<br />'7,000
<br />5,000
<br />12,000
<br />12,000
<br />77,300
<br />
<br />tY!':<
<br />f-~
<br />,~
<br />
<br />$3,120
<br />
<br />$5,550
<br />
<br />$3,360
<br />
<br />.."
<br />,'-,-"
<br />
<br />4,230
<br />25,170
<br />4,260
<br />
<br />5,610
<br />
<br />500
<br />710
<br />43,840
<br />-2,500
<br />41,340
<br />3,360
<br />$44,700
<br />3,633
<br />1,758
<br />5,391
<br />-7,8
<br />$70
<br />
<br />t::' .'~
<br />"'"
<br />
<br />2,520
<br />16,920
<br />2,500
<br />
<br />4,930
<br />
<br />490
<br />· 530
<br />31,010
<br />2,500
<br />28,510
<br />2,317
<br />$30,827
<br />2,506
<br />1,210
<br />3.716
<br />-5.3
<br />$71
<br />
<br />4,230
<br />28,770
<br />4,220
<br />
<br />6,410
<br />
<br />510
<br />900
<br />50,540
<br />2,500
<br />48,040
<br />3,905
<br />$51,945
<br />4,222
<br />1,957
<br />6,179
<br />-6.5
<br />$96
<br />
<br />~~.;.,
<br />'0",
<br />f:a~
<br />
<br />...
<br />
<br />, 7,000 af/yr from Big Sandy Unit, The balance of 6,700 would be pumped from
<br />the Green River through a pipeline built by Chevron,
<br />. January 1983 prices in $1,000.
<br />. Increased mitigation costs reflect additional fishery and cultural resource
<br />mitigation.
<br />· 8 1/8 percent for 2 years.
<br />. 8 1/8 percent over 100-years.
<br />, Net effect considering water depletion and salt reduction of Big Sandy saline
<br />water and Green River water to Chevron through their pipeline.
<br />, Dollars per ton ($/ton).
<br />
<br />5-6
<br />
<br />~l
<br />
<br />-.,
<br />
<br />~, ..
<br />
<br />Vv'121l
<br />
<br />i
<br />i3
<br />
|