My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP04005
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
WSP04005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:53:13 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:05:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8449.918
Description
South Platte Projects
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Date
3/1/1981
Author
CWCB
Title
South Platte River Basin Assessment - Plan of Study
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Platte River. Reuse and increased consumptive use of existing <br /> <br /> <br />levels of transbasin imports, where legally permissible, also <br /> <br /> <br />will be taken into account. <br /> <br /> <br />As part of this work task, a preliminary evaluation of <br /> <br /> <br />water rights diversion records in the basin will be made. Much <br /> <br /> <br />of the impact of flow diversions should be reflected in the <br /> <br /> <br />updated "point flow. study completed by the U.S. Water and <br /> <br /> <br />Power Resources Service. <br /> <br /> <br />Criteria for Measuring Impacts (Task II) <br /> <br /> <br />Criteria are required to evaluate a set of water resources <br /> <br /> <br />development alternatives. Several methods have been proposed <br /> <br /> <br />to select criteria. However, none has been extensively applied <br /> <br /> <br />to regional water resources planning. <br /> <br /> <br />The selection of an appropriate set of criteria to measure <br /> <br /> <br />the impacts (that is, costs and benefits) of water resources <br /> <br /> <br />development alternatives normally is based upon a combination <br /> <br /> <br />of given assumptions, judgment and experience. If important <br /> <br /> <br />criteria have not been included, the adequacy and acceptability <br /> <br /> <br />of the evaluation based upon these selected criteria may be <br /> <br /> <br />questioned. On the other hand, inclusion of too many criteria <br /> <br /> <br />may complicate the whole alternative evaluation procedure. <br /> <br /> <br />Hence, the number and composition of criteria included in the <br /> <br /> <br />evaluation process warrant considerable thought. <br /> <br /> <br />An important feature to consider in selecting criteria to <br /> <br /> <br />measure impacts is that both monetary and non-monetary <br /> <br />-5- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.