Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I tt09 <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Commercial power investments bearing the highest interest <br /> <br />rates are amortized first, unless a required payment is <br /> <br />necessary in a lower interest-bearing investment. <br /> <br />Reimbursable costs appropriately allocable or assignable <br /> <br />to irrigation development would be noninterest-bearing <br /> <br />in accordance with Reclamation law. <br /> <br />3. Future Investments <br /> <br />Remaining potential future powerplants envisioned in the <br /> <br />original P-S MBP plan are retained in this analysis. Since <br /> <br />these future powerplants would be required to be reauthorized <br /> <br />by Congress, their inclusion in the scale of development was <br /> <br />delayed beyond the critical payout period to be sure the <br /> <br />net power rate required for payout of the existing <br /> <br />authorized units would not be affected. <br /> <br />4. Coat Allocations and Sub allocations <br /> <br />The allocations of costs of the multiple-purpose elements <br /> <br />of the plan in the Eastern Division have been made by the <br /> <br />agency having construction, jurisdiction in keeping with <br /> <br />the practice established by interagency agreement in 1954. <br /> <br />The "Separable Costs - Remaining Benefits" method of <br /> <br />allocation has been used. The procedures employed in the <br /> <br />allocations are similar to earlier allocations. Federally <br /> <br />27 <br />