My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP03657
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
WSP03657
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:51:29 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:53:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8272.300.50
Description
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Advisory Council
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
1/1/1990
Author
CRBSC Advisory Counc
Title
1989 Annual Report on the Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Program
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Annual Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />developed haa not been ettected. BLM neecla to expedite development <br />ot that ayat_. <br />o <br />en The Council remains concernecl vith the salinity control <br />CJl prograa described by BIM in ita July 1987 report to Congress. The <br />~ Council believea that BIM's report vas both inadequate and <br />unresponsive to the Congressional directives. The Council <br />recomiDends BIM treat salinity control as a priJlary objective in the. <br />Colorado River Basin. <br /> <br />It has been determined that more than 1,000,000 tons of salt <br />must be removed from the River system each year by the turn of the <br />century in order to maintain the adopted numeric criteria. The BIM <br />is the largest land manager in the Basin, and lands administered <br />by the BUI are major contributors of salt to the river. The <br />Council recommends, BIM identify salinity control activities, <br />achievable salt load reductions, feasible control actions and the <br />associated costs per ton of those reductions to be carried out with <br />FY 1990 funding. Further, the Council recommends that DIM allocate <br />adequate funding specifically identified for salinity control. <br /> <br />Fish and Wildlife Service <br /> <br />The Council supports the continued coordination between the <br />Fish and Wildlife Service U'WS), ReClamation, USDA and EPA in <br />addressing the issue of, fish and wildlife habitat values foregone, <br />and appreciates the efforts made by the FWS in addressing the <br />Council's concerns. <br /> <br />U.S. Geoloaical Survev <br /> <br />The Council believes that it is basically a federal obligation <br />to provide the hydrologic data and interpretive studies required <br />to carry out the objectives of the salinity control program. The <br />U.S. Geological Survey's (USGS) role is to provide information and <br />interpretive studies of water resources ana regional and national <br />level. Operation of many of the monitoring stations is cost shared <br />with the Basin states. The USGS continues to cooperate with <br />Reclamation, USDA and BIM on site-specific assessments of salinity <br />control measures. The Council commends the USGS for its <br />coordination and support role in salinity control activities such <br />as NASQAN activities at 11 of 20 key locations which Reclamation <br />uses for salinity accounting in the Basin. <br /> <br />'The USGS -provides data on a-number of stations on the river. <br />Reclamation, using data supplied by the USGS, evaluates the data <br />to provide the states, local entities, and the Forum with time- <br /> <br />5, <br /> <br />,l '. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.