My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP03596
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
WSP03596
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:51:11 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:52:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8275.100
Description
Legislation and Litigation -- SALINITY -- Federal Legislation
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
1/1/3000
Title
Statement of the Committee of Fourteen on Behalf of the Governors of the Seven Colorado River Basin States on HR 12165 Before the House of Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs - date unknown
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />,(.-, <br />J:..... <br />'i>~ , <br /> <br /><:..~ <br />,; A+,~;l <br /> <br />~.... <br />l'0 <br />o <br />(Xl <br /> <br />the resolution proposing ratification of the Treaty in 1945, <br />representatives of the State Department unequivocally assured <br />the Senate that the proposed Treaty allowed the United States <br />to deliver 1.5 million acre-feet, regardless of quality, even <br />if the water was unusable by !-lexica. <br /> <br />Since the beginning of this controversy, Mexico has claimed <br />that she is entitled under the 19~f Treaty to insist that all <br />of the million and one-half acre-feet delivered must be of a <br /> <br />quality usable for irrigation, and has frequently claimed that <br />that quality must be no worse than the quality enjoyed by the <br />last major diversion from the Colorado River in the United <br /> <br />States, Imperial Dam. <br />On June 17, 1972, after. a meeting in WaShington, D.C., <br />President Nixon and President Echeverria of Mexico issued a <br /> <br />Joint r.ommunique in which it >!as. promised that "a permanent, <br />definitive and just" solution to the international salinity <br />problem would be promptly reco~~ended by a special representa- <br />tive to be named by President Ilixon. The HOIlOl'able Herbert <br />Bro'inell was later named special representative and he headed <br /> <br />a task force of federal agency pel'sonnel who made an intensive <br /> <br />study of the problem in late 1972. <br /> <br />l1r. Bro.mell reported his <br /> <br />proposals to President Nixon on December 28, 1972. His <br />recommendation consisted principally of a desalting plant so <br />sized and sited as to be able to desalinate a large portion <br />of the Vlellton-Hohawk Project return flo;ls. He also proposed the <br />lining of a section of the Coachella Canal in California in order <br /> <br />to salvage a quantity of .waters no" lost through seepage, so <br /> <br /> <br />as to be able to obtain credit for such salvabe waters and use <br /> <br />them to repay to the River the quantities of substitution water <br /> <br />released to Hexieo from storage in the United States above the <br />Treaty obligation. <br /> <br />Thereafter, negotiations "ere initiated with Mexico with <br /> <br />-4- <br /> <br />L <br /> <br />'. <br /> <br />......:-, <br />.~'. '-. <br /> <br />'./"".' . <br />::. . -..: :~, ~.~ ~ >:~::::.~ .;(::::\:: :~~ <br /> <br />.:',:' <br />, ''';-. ,~,. <br /> <br />J. <br /> <br />..-.... <br /> <br />,. .:-.-~ . ~ " . ~. <br />i,;:i:\}h'9.... <br /> <br />'"'' <br />-, <br />""_.:"'i <br />...-jl~' <br /> <br />;~'"\;.\.-''' <br /> <br />r <br /> <br />{,::;.,...-. ,H. <br />.. ";'.:...:-.'" .,-,:'.' <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.