My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP03265
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
WSP03265
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2009 10:41:08 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:37:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
7630.275
Description
Wild and Scenic-Flat Tops Wilderness Area
State
CO
Date
6/11/1973
Author
CRWCD
Title
Flat Tops Wilderness Area-Statement of the Colorado River Water Conservation District Before Senate Subcommittee on Public Lands Hearing on S 702 a Bill to Designate the Flat Tops Wilderness Colorado
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />'~ ~,' :.Jkt/U~~$~~-. <br /> <br />the District. Map 1 attached to this statement shows the 1973 Directors and <br /> <br />their respective counties. The River District is the primary western Colorado <br /> <br />water policy body and the principal headwaters of the Colorado River originate <br /> <br />within its boundaries. Map 2 attached to this statement shows some of these <br /> <br />headwater streams. These headwa,ters contribute something over 60% of the <br /> <br />, <br />flow of the Colorado River at Lee Ferry, Arizona, the dividing point between <br /> <br />the Upper and Lower Colorado River Basins 0 They contributed more water before <br /> <br />massive'transversions took so much of the high quality headwaters to the eastern <br /> <br />slope of Colorado. Further, there is a scheme now pending to take approximately <br /> <br />100,000 acre feet per year from the Upper South Fork of the White River into the <br /> <br />Colorado River to partly exchange for the transversion of an additional 144,000 <br /> <br />acre feet annually from the headwaters of the Colorado River. <br /> <br />From the standpoint of the local people, we would like to suggest that <br /> <br />hearings be held in the field in the vicinity of the lands under consideration, <br /> <br />when possible. In the case of the S. 702, a more accurate representation of the <br /> <br />thinking and attitudes of aU the people would be available to the Subcommittee <br /> <br />with hearings held at Meeker. Although it may appear optimum to hold hearings <br /> <br />on Colorado wildernesses proposal bills at a population center like Denver, the <br /> <br />people who are most directly affected can ill afford the time or money to travel <br /> <br />to Denver to testify. Communities whose present and future welfare and economic <br /> <br />viability are wholly or partially dependent upon multiple use of public lands may <br /> <br />very well suffer tangible and intangible losses if relatively large areas of natural <br /> <br />-2- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.