My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP03224
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
WSP03224
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2009 10:41:21 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:37:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8210.140.20.A
Description
Colorado River - Colo River Basin - Orgs/Entities - CRBSF - California - Colo River Board of Calif
State
CA
Date
6/12/1997
Author
Gerald Zimmerman
Title
Executive Directors Monthly Report to the Colorado River Board of California
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />-- .' <br /> <br />The final June 6th forecast for April through July unregulated inflow to Lake Powell is <br />12.200 maf, which is 158 percent of the 30-year average for the period 1961-1990. The inflow to <br />Lake Powell for the 1996-97 water year is expected to be 16.799 maf, or 143 percent of the 30-year <br />average. <br /> <br />The Lower Division states' estimated consumptive use of Colorado River water for calendar <br />year 1997, as estimated by Board staff, totals 8.459 maf and is projected as follows: Arizona, 2.989 <br />maf; California, 5.210 maf; Nevada, 0.260 mat: Estimated additional unmeasured return flow credits <br />of 0.262 maf would reduce the total amount to 8.197 maf. For calendar year 1997, the Central <br />Arizona Project (CAP) is projected to divert 1.477 maf and The Metropolitan Water District of <br />Southern California (MWD) 1.245 maf. <br /> <br />The preliminary June 3rd estimate of the 1997 end-of-year California agricultural <br />consumptive use of Colorado River water under the first three priorities of the 1931 California Seven <br />Party Agreement is 3.906 maf. This estimate is based on the collective use through May 1997 by <br />the Palo Verde Irrigation District, the Yuma Project Reservation Division, the Imperial Irrigation <br />District, and the Coachella Valley Water District. Figure 1, bound at the end of this report, depicts <br />the monthly forecasts of end-of-year agricultura1 use since the beginning of the year. <br /> <br />Colorado River Operations <br /> <br />Last month I reported that Reclamation had released an initial draft of the 1998 Annual <br />Operating Plan for the Colorado River System Reservoirs (1998 AOP) and was accepting comments <br />on the initial draft through May 16th. Included in the Board folder are copies of some of the <br />comments received by Reclamation from: 1) the Central Arizona Project Association; 2) the Imperial <br />Irrigation District; and 3) the MWD. The next meeting of the Colorado River Management Work <br />Group will be held on June 20,1997, in Las Vegas, Nevada to review the draft 1998 AOP. <br /> <br />As discussed during previous Board meetings, Reclamation has undertaken an effort to <br />develop guidelines for declaring surplus and shortage conditions on the River. Several different <br />operating strategies were run by Reclamation to determine the impacts associated with each strategy. <br />During a JWle 3rd meeting held in Las Vegas, Nevada, Reclamation discussed the strategies that had <br />been run as well as the results of each strategy. Those strategies that were tested include: I) flood <br />control, 70 percentile runoff volume into Lake Powell, 70 percent avoidance of a spill at Lake Mead, <br />80 percent protection of the shortage trigger, and basin yield. Reclamation will be accepting <br />comments on the strategies through July 1, 1997. <br /> <br />The Water Education FOWldation sponsored a symposium to celebrate the 75th anniversary <br />of the signing of the Colorado River Compact. The symposium was held at Bishop's Lodge in <br />Santa Fe, New Mexico, the site of the signing of the 1922 Colorado River Compact. All of the <br />agencies, except the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power attended the symposium and <br />made presentations. <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.