My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP03066
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
WSP03066
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:48:28 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:31:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8112.600
Description
Arkansas White Red Basins Interagency Committee - AWRBIAC -- Reports
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
1/1/1988
Title
Annual Report 1986-1987
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Annual Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />C~~ <br /> <br />(..\ <br /> <br />P- <br />C') <br />00 <br />00 <br /> <br />-7- <br /> <br />sufficient authority under existing law in Oklahoma to provide <br />and protect instream flows. <br /> <br />St~.:t".... ()f .t-I.".~.. "e"i~() <br /> <br />Mr. Steve E. Reynolds, State Engineer, New Mexico Interstate <br />Stream Commission presented a summary of instream flow rights <br />with regard to the State of New Mexico. Mr. Reynolds advised <br />AWRBIAC that the streamflow required at various points in the <br />state is governed by interstate compacts, international treaties, <br />federal court decrees, water rights conferred by the state under <br />the doctrine of prior appropriation, and legislation authorizing <br />federal water development projects. <br /> <br />I>_ep!!r::tlll"nt of the ...I.llt."rior: <br /> <br />Dr. Berton L. Lamb, Policy Analyst, National Ecology Center, U.S. <br />Fish and Wildlife Service, Fort Collins, Colorado, outlined basic <br />developments in the law and technology of instream flows. Dr. <br />Lamb briefed AWRBIAC on where the instream flow "movement" stands <br />today and the range of technology available for quantifying <br />instream uses, and under what circumstances each of these <br />technologies is appropriate. <br /> <br />S.ta t."... ofmPf_iElEl()\Jr:J <br /> <br />Dr. Frederick A. Brunner, Director, Missouri Department of <br />Natural Resources, presented the State of Missouri's perspective <br />on instream flows. Dr. Brunner advised the membership that the <br />State of Missouri has no statutory laws providing for instream <br />flows and is a riparian water law state. The responsibility for <br />assuring that instream needs are met is that of the Missouri <br />State Courts. Dr. Brunner discussed difficulties in setting <br />water quality standards in Missouri streams. Also highlighted by <br />Dr. Brunner were legal issues under investigation regarding <br />maintenance of minimum flows for water quality purposes. <br />Discussed briefly were methodologies used to examine minimum flow <br />aspects within the state. <br /> <br />En".,i r:()IlIIl"Il:t~k~r()t,,~.t i().Il_~g ell~~ <br /> <br />Mr. Robert "Bruce" Elliott, Chief, Water Quality Management <br />Branch, Environmental Protection Agency, Dallas, Texas, <br />highlighted provisions of the Clean Water Act of 1972 which were <br />indirectly related to instream flow by requiring states to adopt <br />water quality standards and designate appropriate uses for <br />streams. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.