Laserfiche WebLink
<br />00181)7 <br /> <br />Timeliness of irrigation. Research at the Garden City Experi- <br />ment Station with winter wheat has shown that withholding water <br />at certain stages of growth (even to the point where wheat <br />growth may be restricted) can conserve water and even increase <br />yields over those with injundicious use of irrigation. This <br />year's dryland wheat yields (and others like them in the past) <br />illustrate this rather dramatically, During mid-May this <br />year, I inspected a number of wheat fields showing signs of <br />severe moisture shortage in our area. With hot, dry weather, <br />those fields would have produced little or no gain. An inch- <br />and-a half of rain on May 28 and two similar rains, June 8 and <br />17, together with cool ing weather, produced wheat yields equal <br />to those from irrigated fields. (Some in excess of 50 bushels <br />per acre.) Obviously we cannot control the temperature but we <br />can do a more effective job of water appl ication. Similar (if <br />less striking) data are available for other crops. <br /> <br />With limited water available, we may become less concerned with <br />unusually high yields. Adequate data exist to question the <br />practicabil ity of pushing for maximum yields if those last few <br />bushels come at exorbitant costs of scarce water. <br /> <br />Our own work with winter irrigation in the production of sorghums <br />illustrates one possible method of greater efficiency of irrigation <br />facil ities. An application of ten to twelve inches of irrigation <br />water during the winter months has produced a ten-year average <br />yield of 67 bushels per acre on continuously cropped land. <br /> <br />Although some irrigation farmers have a sort of sixth sense when <br />judging their water appl ications, it seems reasonable to expect <br />more efficient use of water with more adequate measurements. <br /> <br />Engineers and others (including many farmers) know the value of <br />cutback heads and of regulating appl ication rates to prevent <br />tail-water loss. Tail water pits and reuse of the water are <br />compromise measures with some practical value. <br /> <br />Much of our irrigated land could be better prepared for more <br />efficient irrigation. With cheap, plentiful water, there is <br />less inducement to do this, As water becomes scarcer, improve- <br />ments can be made. Such land improvement will make natural <br />precipitation more effective, also. <br /> <br />Operation of sprinkler systems can be improved. We have seen <br />much runoff water (even in the sandhill region) where application <br />rates are too high. On hardland, runoff is even a greater <br />problem. <br /> <br />Optimum ferti lizer applications may help increase irrigation <br />water efficiency. Farmers could make more complete use of <br />soil tests and realistic interpretations of such tests, <br /> <br />13. <br />