Laserfiche WebLink
<br />It is my opinion that we h~ve varieties in each crop now that <br />utilize water more effi~iehtly than other varieties. Within the <br />next 25 years we w,ill lik,ely' be selecting varieties to grow under <br />irrigation for their water efficiency, the same as we now select <br />a variety for its igr~n~mic characteristics of diseases and insect <br />tolerance, qual ity; winter-hardiness, maturity, etc,ll <br /> <br />Following Mr. Banbury's presentation, the discussion dealt principally <br />with what could be expected in .terms of efficiency in water use. Asked <br />the average irrigation.efficiency in northwestern Kansas, Mr. Banbury <br />said he doubts that it is more than 50 percent, 'but in the future he <br />expects it to increase to 70-75 percent. He expects a 20-25 percent <br />decrease in wate.r needed for comparable levels of production to be eas; ly <br />accompl ished in the next 10-25 years. Part of the reduction could be <br />traced to tail water operations and others would be related to better <br />management practices. He doubts that greater efficiency in water use <br />has resulted from sprinkler irrigation. <br /> <br />Both Mr. Erhart and Mr. Banbury stated that they think substantial <br />gains and efficiency can be, and have been, made in both southwestern <br />and northwestern Kansas, Mr. Erhart cited studies at the experiment <br />stations that attempt to relate yields and various rates of water <br />appl ication. Both men indicated experiments with wheat, corn, and <br />sorghum involve many complex factors. Isolating the dependent and <br />independent variables is difficult. <br /> <br />The fol lowing is a reproduction of Mr. Andy Erhart's remarks. <br /> <br />lilt seems obvious t'hat irrigation water requirements will continue <br />to increase as more wells .are dug, reservoirs built, and more land <br />brought under irrigation although the economic situation may <br />influence the rate of increase. Southwestern Kansas has seen a <br />rather phenomenal increase in irrigated acreage. In September of <br />1966, I conducted a I ittle survey of 21 counties asking local <br />authorities how much land was under irrigation and how much increase <br />they expected within five years. Already, almost every county <br />has exceeded its 1971 expectations. The development of the sandhill <br />area for sprinkler irrigation has been more extensive than many <br />of us thought possible. <br /> <br />There are thousands of acres of flatland .in this area that could <br />be quite productive if a source of water :becomes available. Ground <br />water is not present.. Perhaps SOme of the 'impractical appearing <br />schemes' for bringing water to the area may become more feasible <br />in the future as new. techniques develop or attitudes and conditions <br />change. <br /> <br />Obviously there is room for .improvement right now with better <br />application of known practices, We might I ist.just a few of these. <br /> <br />12. <br />