Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Although there is room for improvement with the application of <br />known methods, there is much yet to be learned: This promises to <br />be both exciting and ,rel.,arding. In the field of sprinkler irrigation, <br />e.g., we need much more information on the microcl imate surrounding <br />the plants, We know something of the possibil ities of spoon-feeding <br />plant nutrients with 'sprinklers. ~e have had some reports of insect <br />control under' such systems. ' Last summer a sorghum field'was reported <br />completely free of greenbugs af,ter nit'rogenous fertil'izer was applied <br />with the irrigatio'n water: 'Neighboring fields were seriously <br />damaged by the insects. Sprinkle~ irrigation offe~s some'intriguing <br />possibil ities for disease a'nd insect control. , ' ' <br />, . ',I I <br /> <br />" , <br />Water requirements 'of plants are in direct proportion' to evapo-, <br />transpiration. Much more must be learned about \-Iay.s 'of reduci'ng <br />this use (or 1055) of \-later. The microclimate men~i6ned earl i~r may <br />be one approach. , Plant breeding may contribute--perhaps varietal <br />differences are significant. Seed and plant treatment with chemicals <br />(such as fatty alcohols) have sho\-ln some promise. Soil surfactants <br />and mulches of various kinds that reduce direct evaporation 'losses <br />may be worthy of, study. <br /> <br />Subirrigation, \-Ihich is a revival and updating of the old systems <br />some of us used in our gardens many years ago, may bring some accepta,ble <br />methods. <br /> <br />I mentioned ,real istic interpretation of soil tests and, in general, <br />I bel ieve that excessive use of ferti 1 ;zers is' often recommenqed. <br />However, we certainly need more knowledge of the chemical analyses <br />necessary to give us more rei iable information than we can now get. <br /> <br />We are told that conventional field crops use only four percent of the <br />sun's energy. Maybe we don't want to use 100 percent of that energy <br />but perhaps there Ls room for improvement. Dreamers have predicted <br />farms under glass and recent expansion in greenhouse tomato production <br />makes one wonder what the future might bring. Certainly we could <br />use more of the sun's energy, more completely control the environment <br />with respect to CO2, humidity, insects, diseases, and plant nutrients <br />as well as irrigation water. 'Perhaps that would be the ultimate 50' <br />far as efficient use of I imited water is concerned. Provision could <br />be made for catching almost every drop of rain that falls and reusing <br />it as much as possible. <br /> <br />I have mentioned sprinkler irrigation several times and'may have left <br />the impression that I believe this system of irrigation is as wonder- <br />ful as some of its proponents claim it to be. I have marvelled at <br />the improvements that have been made in sprinkler systems in recent <br />years, They have made possible some sandy land farming that could <br />not otherwise be field crops. I am sure their use will continue. <br />I would suggest one word of caution. Their use on hardland with <br />rather low-qual i ty water presents a serious threat. Al though I am <br />not a soil chemist, it would seem to me that rather frequent, light <br /> <br />14, <br />