<br />The Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy
<br />District is the Legal Agency for the Fryingpan-
<br />Arkansas Project. having entered into a Contract with
<br />the United States on January 21, 1965. whereby the
<br />District would repay, with interest, the assigned re-
<br />imbursable CQsts of the completed Project. As such,
<br />its Board of Directors has a primary responsibility to
<br />see the Project completed at the earliest possible date,
<br />to keep the final cost to a minimum, and have a Water
<br />Management Project which will accomplish those
<br />things authorized by the Congress in 1962.
<br />The members of the Board of Directors carefully
<br />reviewed the Budget submitted to the Congress by
<br />President Nixon. and after consulting with represen-
<br />tatives from ()ther Water Organizations throughout
<br />the United States, adopted a Statement requesting the
<br />Congress to increase the appropriation by $1,300,000.
<br />It was determined absolutely essential that $300,000
<br />be added to commence construction on the Second and
<br />Final Phase of the Hunter Tunnel System, which would
<br />complete the entire Southside Collection System, and
<br />$1,000,000 to start construction on the Water and
<br />Sewer Svstems for the recreation areas at Pueblo
<br />Reservoi;. It is expected limited recreation use will
<br />be permitted on Pueblo Reservoir in 1975, and, as was
<br />the case at Turquoise Lake, the heavy use on a daily
<br />basis without adequate sanitary facilities. will create
<br />a serious and long lasting problem.
<br />Supporting testimony was adopted by the Board,
<br />and presented before the Arkansas River Basin Inter-
<br />state Committee at their Annual Meeting in March,
<br />in Tulsa, Oklahoma, fOT consideration and adoption.
<br />The Arkansas River Basin Interstate Committee con-
<br />sists of five representatives from the States of Arkan-
<br />sas, Oklahoma, Missouri, Kansas and Colorado, each
<br />of whom was appointed by the Governor of the reo
<br />spective State. A single statement supporting those
<br />Projects approved was then prepared. and presented
<br />before the Subcommittees of the U. S. Senate and U. S.
<br />House bv Mr. Charles L. Thomson, General Manager
<br />Southea;tern Colorado Water Conservancy District,
<br />who was elected Chairman of the Arkansas River Basin
<br />Interstate Committee for the years 1974 and 1975.
<br />Support for the appropriation was also obtained froIll
<br />the Water Resouces Congress and the National Water
<br />Resources Association. Congress subsequently appro.
<br />priated the additional $1.3 million, and the Budget
<br />was signed into Law in October 1974 by President
<br />Gerald Ford. Severe National economic problems in
<br />the later part of the year necessitated the withholding
<br />of part of the additional funds until after January
<br />1975.
<br />Thp. Board extends their sillcere gratitude to the
<br />Honorable Peter H. Dominick and Floyd Haskell,
<br />United States Senators from Colorado; and the
<br />Honorable Frank E. Evans and William Armstrong,
<br />U. S. Representatives from Colorado, who introduced
<br />necessary Legislation requesting the increased appro-
<br />
<br />7
<br />
<br />~
<br />-.,J
<br />00
<br />
<br />.,
<br />
<br />priation, and who supported the request with their best
<br />efforts, Support was also received from members of
<br />the Congress {rom the Arkansas River Basin Sta.tes,
<br />as well as many others who truly believe in Water
<br />Management.
<br />
<br />FRYINGPAN.ARKANSAS PROJECT
<br />
<br />. .,'
<br />
<br />Earlier in this Annual Report, under the Section
<br />"Testimonv Before Congress", we explained that each
<br />vear the m.embers of the Board of Directors of the Dis.
<br />trict, in cooperation with members of the Color~do
<br />Congressional Delegation, Water Resource Orgamza-
<br />tions and representatives from Official Federal and
<br />State Agencies. develop testimony in support of appro-
<br />priations which will permit the continued construction
<br />of the Fryingpan-Arkansas Project and Corps of En-
<br />gineers Water Resource Projects in Colorado. Many
<br />people do not realize that authorization of a Water
<br />Resouce Project by the Congress of the United States
<br />does not provide funding for its completion. Rather.
<br />funds are appropriated each year by the Congress of
<br />the United States for the actual amount of construction
<br />which can take place in that Fiscal Year or less. Many
<br />times either the Administration or the Congress do not
<br />see fit to appropriate the amounts of money requested
<br />by the Spunsoring Organizations. There are instances
<br />of Projects \....hich have been authorized for many
<br />vears, but on which no construction has begun. In
<br />i 974 the Congress of the United States passed an Act
<br />which requires the United States Bureau of TIeclama-
<br />tion, and the Corps of Engineers, to evaluate all such
<br />Projects, and to recommend tho~e which should be
<br />deauthorized. Consideration is also given to Projects
<br />which are underway, but which, for various reasons,
<br />have become economically infeasible.
<br />
<br />
<br />Mt. Elbert Pumped.Storage Powerplant
<br />
<br />8
<br />
|