Laserfiche WebLink
<br />The Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy <br />District is the Legal Agency for the Fryingpan- <br />Arkansas Project. having entered into a Contract with <br />the United States on January 21, 1965. whereby the <br />District would repay, with interest, the assigned re- <br />imbursable CQsts of the completed Project. As such, <br />its Board of Directors has a primary responsibility to <br />see the Project completed at the earliest possible date, <br />to keep the final cost to a minimum, and have a Water <br />Management Project which will accomplish those <br />things authorized by the Congress in 1962. <br />The members of the Board of Directors carefully <br />reviewed the Budget submitted to the Congress by <br />President Nixon. and after consulting with represen- <br />tatives from ()ther Water Organizations throughout <br />the United States, adopted a Statement requesting the <br />Congress to increase the appropriation by $1,300,000. <br />It was determined absolutely essential that $300,000 <br />be added to commence construction on the Second and <br />Final Phase of the Hunter Tunnel System, which would <br />complete the entire Southside Collection System, and <br />$1,000,000 to start construction on the Water and <br />Sewer Svstems for the recreation areas at Pueblo <br />Reservoi;. It is expected limited recreation use will <br />be permitted on Pueblo Reservoir in 1975, and, as was <br />the case at Turquoise Lake, the heavy use on a daily <br />basis without adequate sanitary facilities. will create <br />a serious and long lasting problem. <br />Supporting testimony was adopted by the Board, <br />and presented before the Arkansas River Basin Inter- <br />state Committee at their Annual Meeting in March, <br />in Tulsa, Oklahoma, fOT consideration and adoption. <br />The Arkansas River Basin Interstate Committee con- <br />sists of five representatives from the States of Arkan- <br />sas, Oklahoma, Missouri, Kansas and Colorado, each <br />of whom was appointed by the Governor of the reo <br />spective State. A single statement supporting those <br />Projects approved was then prepared. and presented <br />before the Subcommittees of the U. S. Senate and U. S. <br />House bv Mr. Charles L. Thomson, General Manager <br />Southea;tern Colorado Water Conservancy District, <br />who was elected Chairman of the Arkansas River Basin <br />Interstate Committee for the years 1974 and 1975. <br />Support for the appropriation was also obtained froIll <br />the Water Resouces Congress and the National Water <br />Resources Association. Congress subsequently appro. <br />priated the additional $1.3 million, and the Budget <br />was signed into Law in October 1974 by President <br />Gerald Ford. Severe National economic problems in <br />the later part of the year necessitated the withholding <br />of part of the additional funds until after January <br />1975. <br />Thp. Board extends their sillcere gratitude to the <br />Honorable Peter H. Dominick and Floyd Haskell, <br />United States Senators from Colorado; and the <br />Honorable Frank E. Evans and William Armstrong, <br />U. S. Representatives from Colorado, who introduced <br />necessary Legislation requesting the increased appro- <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />~ <br />-.,J <br />00 <br /> <br />., <br /> <br />priation, and who supported the request with their best <br />efforts, Support was also received from members of <br />the Congress {rom the Arkansas River Basin Sta.tes, <br />as well as many others who truly believe in Water <br />Management. <br /> <br />FRYINGPAN.ARKANSAS PROJECT <br /> <br />. .,' <br /> <br />Earlier in this Annual Report, under the Section <br />"Testimonv Before Congress", we explained that each <br />vear the m.embers of the Board of Directors of the Dis. <br />trict, in cooperation with members of the Color~do <br />Congressional Delegation, Water Resource Orgamza- <br />tions and representatives from Official Federal and <br />State Agencies. develop testimony in support of appro- <br />priations which will permit the continued construction <br />of the Fryingpan-Arkansas Project and Corps of En- <br />gineers Water Resource Projects in Colorado. Many <br />people do not realize that authorization of a Water <br />Resouce Project by the Congress of the United States <br />does not provide funding for its completion. Rather. <br />funds are appropriated each year by the Congress of <br />the United States for the actual amount of construction <br />which can take place in that Fiscal Year or less. Many <br />times either the Administration or the Congress do not <br />see fit to appropriate the amounts of money requested <br />by the Spunsoring Organizations. There are instances <br />of Projects \....hich have been authorized for many <br />vears, but on which no construction has begun. In <br />i 974 the Congress of the United States passed an Act <br />which requires the United States Bureau of TIeclama- <br />tion, and the Corps of Engineers, to evaluate all such <br />Projects, and to recommend tho~e which should be <br />deauthorized. Consideration is also given to Projects <br />which are underway, but which, for various reasons, <br />have become economically infeasible. <br /> <br /> <br />Mt. Elbert Pumped.Storage Powerplant <br /> <br />8 <br />