My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP02523
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
WSP02523
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:37:21 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:10:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8126.800
Description
Arkansas River Coordinating Committee - Projects - Issues
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
9/29/1995
Author
DWR
Title
Report To The State Of Kansas - The State Of Colorado's Efforts To Comply With The Arkansas River Compact
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />.' <br /> <br />Committee Convened and Subcommittees Formed <br /> <br />The ARCC met eleven times over a twelve month period from September, 1994, to <br />September, 1995. At the first meeting on September 22, 1994, in La Junta, Colorado, <br />Governor Romer stressed the importance of the committees responsibilities to the future of <br />the Arkansas River basin. <br /> <br />Initial meetings of the committee were used to brief members on the Slatus of the <br />Kansas v. Colorado lawsuit, discuss potential organizational structure, and develop an overall <br />work plan. Briefings were provided on the 1980 John Martin Reservoir Operating Plan and <br />the Winter Water Storage Program. The Committee organized itself into three working <br />subcommittees: the augmentation water subcommittee, the water acquisition subcommittee <br />and, the recreation water subcommittee. The augmentation subcommittee met numerous <br />times to review and provide input and information on the 1996 Use Rules. <br /> <br />Recommendations of the Committee <br /> <br />Each of the three subcommittees provided recommendations the full committee for <br />consideration. The ARCC positions regarding actions to comply with the Arkansas River <br />Compact are: <br /> <br />. Given the availability of water for purchase and/or short term lease, the future <br />interests of the region and state would best be met by repaying Kansas with <br />water deliveries. <br /> <br />. State officials should look to existing augmentation groups, and any new <br />entities created by valley water users, to meet future well augmentation <br />requirements that address the problems of depletions to usable state~e flows <br />and prevent injury to senior Colorado surface rights. <br /> <br />. The ability to pay will be determined by the well augmentation groups and <br />their members and a reconunendation in this area is unnecessary. <br /> <br />. With respect to the purchase of water rights to be used for augmentation: <br /> <br />1. Do not purchase entire basin augmentation needs from a single <br />geographic region to minimize impacts on: <br /> <br />a) revegetation of the area, <br />b) county tax base, and <br />c) agricultural dependent conununities. <br /> <br />21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.