Laserfiche WebLink
<br />In this case, power and energy from the northwestern Colorado ,thermal <br /> <br />4It generating station would continue to be wheeled over project lines <br /> <br />from Glen Canyon to pinnacle Peak, and revenues, preliminarily <br /> <br />estimated at around $1,000,000, a year for such wheeling, would <br /> <br />accrue to the project. Diagram, Fig. 3, with the Craig steam plant <br /> <br />included, illustrates the proposed transmission system if plan 3 is <br /> <br />adopted. The continued transmission of power f~om Glen Canyon to <br /> <br /> <br />Phoenix under this plan, with the large additional revenues from <br /> <br /> <br />wheeling would assure financial justification for the construction of <br /> <br />two 345 kv. lines between Glen Canyon and Pinnacle Peak. <br /> <br /> <br />Immediate construction of these two lines would also permit <br /> <br /> <br />early transmission of up to 800 Megawatts of project power to Phoenix <br /> <br />when this becomes available, and until the northern area demand for <br /> <br />project power reduces the power flow to the southern market. After <br /> <br />that, the major amount of power flowing over these lines (by dis- <br /> <br />placement with Glen Canyon power), would be thermal electric power <br /> <br />for which the project would be paid a wheeling charge. This early <br /> <br />major transmission of project power to Arizona would be very beneficial <br /> <br />to the C.R.S.P. <br /> <br />A fourth plan has been proposed by the Arizona Public <br /> <br /> <br />Service company. Under this plan, the A.P.S. offers to construct <br /> <br /> <br />two 345 kv lines from Glen Canyon to Pinnacle Peak, and to wheel all <br /> <br /> <br />project energy available for transmission to the southern market at <br /> <br />4It <br /> <br />specified wheeling charges. This plan would include interconnection <br /> <br />with the A.P.S. Four Corners plant, and no wheeling of power from a <br /> <br />9 <br />