My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP02386
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
WSP02386
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:36:30 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:05:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8221.110.J
Description
Juniper-Cross Mountain Project
State
CO
Basin
Yampa/White
Water Division
6
Date
6/30/1982
Title
An Economic & Technical Review of a Comprehensive Alternative to the Juniper-Cross Mountain Project
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />c <br />C' <br />t... <br />.-' <br /> <br />for a 40 gWh/yr (gigaWatt hours/year) reduction in new residential <br /> <br />,- <br />~ <br /> <br />customer demand by the year 1989, the end of the planning period <br /> <br />we studied. <br /> <br />The table below presents a ~ummary of our findings. The far <br /> <br /> <br />left column (Program Component) identifies the sectors we examined-- <br /> <br />essentially, residential and commercial buildings--and the distinc- <br /> <br />tion we made between new and existing structures. The column also <br /> <br />contains one line with the label "Indirect Savings,"!.~., a reduction <br /> <br />in transmission and distribution (T & D) losses directly attribut- <br /> <br />able to the energy conservation brought about by measures taken in <br /> <br />the residential and commercial sectors. <br /> <br />The three righthand columns in the table identified as "Low", <br /> <br />"Base", and "High" represent the likely range of energy conservation <br /> <br />f; <br />, <br /> <br />which depends primarily on participation rates in the residential <br /> <br />and commercial sectors. We believe that the middle column, !.~~, <br /> <br />the Base Conservation Scenario, is the most probable. Were measures <br /> <br />taken to realize the demand reduction it represents, the CUEA <br /> <br />system would experience savings of over 1000 gWh/yr in 1989. <br /> <br />:,: <br /> <br />Perhaps more worthy of note are the savings of almost 700 gWh/yr <br /> <br />in the Low column. This is a demand reduction of nearly twice the <br /> <br />average annual production (350 gWh/yr) of the Juniper-Cross Project. <br /> <br />.~~ <br /> <br />. <br />Clearly the demand projection measures which we have identified <br /> <br />offer a reasonable alternative to the new capacity which the hydro- <br /> <br />"'~' <br /> <br />electric project represents. Even at very low participation rates <br /> <br />(the Low Conservation Scenario) the need for the new capacity of <br /> <br />the project is more than offset. <br /> <br />vi <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.