Laserfiche WebLink
<br />f'- <br />C'1 <br />"I i'" <br />--1 .... <br />.-1 <br />;:-: <br /> <br />;;:; <br /> <br /><..-j <br /> <br />, <br />:! <br /> <br />4.; <br /> <br />:;:~ <br /> <br />,/ <br /> <br />C' <br /> <br />Summary Table 1 <br /> <br />Direct and Indirect Savings from the EDF Alternatives Plan <br /> <br />Program Component Energy Savings per Conservation Scenario (gWh) <br /> . Low Base High <br />Direct Savings <br />Residential Sector <br /> New homes 246.0 418.2 732.0 <br /> Existing homes 187.4 287.0 430.7 <br />Commercial Sector <br /> New buildings 80.0 120.0 160.0 <br /> Retrofit program 123.3 153.0 182.8 <br /> Total Direct Savings 636.7 978.2 1505.5 <br />Indirect Savings <br /> T & D Savings 30.7 47.0 72.3 <br />Total Energy Savings 667.3 1025.2 1577.8 <br /> <br />Finance and Costs <br /> <br />To put the costs of conservation in concrete terms we identified <br /> <br />a three part energy conservation program for CUEA. It would consist <br /> <br />of the following components: <br /> <br />o low interest loans for conservation measures; <br /> <br />o technical assistance programs for home builders, pros~ <br />'~ pective buyers, realtors, bankers, and other members of <br />Q the community; <br /> <br />o energy audits for all residential and commercial buildings <br />within the service area (with free distribution of some <br />conservation devices). <br /> <br />The costs to CUEA for such a program are summarized below. <br /> <br />vii <br />