My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP02043
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
WSP02043
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:34:06 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:53:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.120.A
Description
Lyman Participating Project
State
WY
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
10/1/1950
Author
USDOI - Bureau of Re
Title
Lyman Project-Wyoming - A Supplement to the Colorado River Storage Project Report - Project Planning Report No. 4-8a.38-2
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />SYNOPSIS <br /> <br />Operation, maintenance, and replacement costs with project develop- <br />ment are expected to average $30,450 annually at 1939-1944 prices, <br />approximately $25,550 more than present costs. Annual per acre costs <br />would be about $.75, an increase of about $.63 over present per acre <br />costs. By proper care in project operation and maintenance and with <br />occasional replacements, the project should realize a useful life of <br />100 years or more. <br /> <br />Comparison of Benefits and Costs <br /> <br />Benefits from the IiYman project attributable to Federal eJ(pendi- <br />tures would compare with the attendant Federal costs in a ratio of 1.02 <br />to 1. FOr th~ comparison both benefits and costs were converted to <br />average annual equivalent values, over a 100-year period beginning with <br />the first year of full project operation. <br /> <br />The net value of benefits from Federal expenditures is estimated <br />at $307,000 annually on the basis of 1939-1944 prices. This includes <br />the direct benefit value to farmers that would result from inoreased <br />crop and livestock production and the indirect benefit value that would <br />result from processing of the additional agricultural products and from <br />increased local sales of goods and services. In estimating benefits an <br />allowanoe also was made for a $3,900 loss in fish and wildlife values <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.