Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />2351 <br />. Dried up acreage around Lake Meredith where selenium has been found should be an <br />issue that is examined. <br />. Fish escapement from Lake Meredith has been a problem; outlet restructure could be a <br />solution to this. <br />3. General Issues - <br />. Selenium, nutrients and suspended solids are the main issues of concern along the <br />Arkansas River to the CDOW. <br />· The Fish and Wildlife service has recently proposed a limit of I to 2 j.lgIL for a national <br />upper limit of selenium in rivers, lakes and reservoirs. <br />4. Turquoise Reservoir Enlargement - <br />. Greenbacks are found above Turquoise Reservoir although the inundation from this <br />project would not affect them it is an issue to be aware of. <br />· Inundation in this area may cause problems with Elk caving grounds or migration <br />patterns, this is an issue to follow up on. <br />· Water deliveries could be made through the Otero pipeline or the mainstream of the <br />Arkansas River. The Otero pipeline option may be a benefit to the fish. <br />. The timing of flows and releases would need to be coordinated with the life cycle needs <br />of the Brown Trout. <br />. A decrease in White Suckers and Lake Trout in Twin Lakes has recently been observed. <br />5. FrvingDan Arkansas ReoDeration - <br />· The affects of this project would most likely consist of more water being stored in <br />Turquoise Reservoir, Twin Lakes and Pueblo Reservoir and the possibility of increased <br />flow in the Arkansas River. <br />· Nitrate levels in the Arkansas are high and the rate of nitrification in the river should be <br />looked at. <br />. The issues mentioned earlier including, selenium, nutrients, and sediment should be <br />examined. The only additional concern for this option would be a possible increase in <br />the temperature of the ri ver. <br />6. Pueblo Reservoir Enlargement- <br />· Inundation could damage viable Heron habitat and a recently improved state wildlife <br />area near the reservoir. <br />· Mitigation efforts in this area would be difficult due to the formation of the land and a <br />lack of flat open space. <br />· There could be water quality issues with this alternative including, metals and <br />stratification of the reservoir. <br />7. Gravel Lakes Storage- <br />· CDOW is more of a technical advisor for gravel permits than a regulating agency. <br />. Gravel pits make "great fishing holes" according to the CDOW so public access should <br />be considered. <br />· If existing gravel pits are converted to storage areas there should be few problems in <br />regard to the CDOW. However, finding a site to create a gravel storage lake could be <br />more difficult. <br />8. Williams Creek Reservoir- <br />. Eutrophication would be a concern due to the high amount of wastewater treatment <br />plant effluent that would be entering the reservoir. <br />. Inundation in this area could threaten the Prebbles Jumping Mouse. No surveys have <br />been done in this area, if the alternative is chosen a survey would need to be conducted. <br /> <br />2 <br />