Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />234G <br />. Pueblo Reservoir Enlargement- Dam safety concerns were raised and should be <br />addressed. Phasing on this and any project should be addressed. The impact of changing <br />population forecasts should also be addressed. <br />· Gravel Pits- Empty gravel pits could he ugly, however these could be popular for <br />recreation and fishing when full. Not many BLM issues were noted. <br />. Williams Creek Reservoir- Erosion issues on Fountain Creek were noted and the <br />potential impacts to water users between the reservoir and the Arkansas River. <br />3. USBLM concurred with the USBR that the USBR is the most likely lead federal permitting <br />agency. <br />4. A further discussion of potential BLM land trades was held. It was again noted that land <br />trades would help facilitate ownership of more desirable properties by the BLM. It was noted <br />that BLM land also is on the south side of Pueblo Reservoir at T21S R66W Sec. 3 NE NE '/.0. <br />5. Finally it was noted that the BLM supports the annual flow program on the Arkansas River, <br />that it provides 12 month/year benefits, and that continuing cooperation between the parties <br />would be beneficial. <br /> <br />2 <br />