Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />.. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br /> <br />2347 <br />. llMlNftiIIMIJI' WA1$ClN <br /> <br />MEETING MINUTES <br /> <br />Project: <br /> <br />Meeting Date: October I, 1999 <br /> <br />Subject: <br /> <br />CSUlSECWCD Technical & <br />Environmental Studies <br />Permitting & Issues Meetings <br />Colorado Division of Parks <br />Permitting Input & Issues <br />SECWCD Offices, Pueblo, Colorado <br /> <br />Prepared By: Jerry Gibbens <br /> <br />Location: <br /> <br />PARTICIPANTS: <br />Gene Rizzi (Colorado State Parks, Lake Pueblo) <br />Paul Flack (Colorado State Parks, Hydrologist) <br />Steve Reese (Colorado State Parks, Arkansas Headwaters Recreation Area) <br />Mike French (Colorado State Parks, Lake Pueblo) <br />Tom Simpson (SECWCD) <br />Charles Cortese (University of Denver) <br />Dick Westmore (GEl Consultants) <br />Lloyd Gronning (Montgomery Watson) <br />Jerry Gibbens (Montgomery Watson) <br /> <br />HANDOUT MATERIALS: <br />. Agenda <br />. Document: "Storage Alternatives Assessment Summary", dated August 9, 1999 (MW). <br />. Document: "Preliminary Regulatory Issues and Permitting Requirements", dated August 9, <br />1999 (MW). <br />. Table: "Recreational Amenities Affected by Raised Operating Pool Alternatives", from draft <br />B&V Preliminary Engineering Technical Report, dated August 23, 1999 (B&V). <br />. Document: "Current recommendation [for Arkansas River instrearn flows]", dated October I, <br />1999 (Colorado State Parks). <br /> <br />DISCUSSION: <br />An introduction of attendees and the purpose for the meeting was first made. The purpose and <br />current status of the SECWCD Storage Study was discussed. It was confirmed that Elephant <br />Rock is currently not being considered as a water storage alternative by Colorado Springs <br />Utilities. However, it is still formally a viable project only because the water rights application is <br />still in the water court. A discussion of each alternative then ensued. <br />