Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />2343 <br /> <br />Alternatives <br /> <br />The group participated in a discussion of each of the six storage alternati ves with respect to <br />potential USFS issues and impacts. The following items were discussed. <br /> <br />Lake Meredith Enlargement. USFS projects and facilities are not affected by this alternative. <br /> <br />Turquoise Reservoir Enlargement. There will be significant and extensive impacts to USFS <br />projects and facilities around Turquoise Reservoir. <br /> <br />Portions of several campgrounds will be inundated, along with boat ramps. Existing water and <br />sewer lines (all gravity lines) are just above the current high water line, and will be inundatcd by <br />a higher pool. Other utilities including electrical and phone lines may also be impacted. Part of <br />the perimeter trail around the lake will be inundated. Specific facilities that will bc inundated can <br />be identified after a map of the proposed high water line is developed. <br /> <br />There are many abandoned mines in the USFS area around the lake. USFS is in the process of <br />completing an inventory of these mines and is working with the State and other organizations to <br />close these sites to mitigate safety hazards. Several abandoned mines will be inundated by a <br />higher pool level, and could allow pollutants (e.g., metals) to be leached into the reservoir water. <br />On the other hand, inundating the mine sites will alleviate any need for further remediation. <br />Linda Fox has a map of known mine sites. <br /> <br />USFS staff questioned whether the 130,000 ac-ft estimate of existing Turquoise Lake volume is <br />the original volume or is adjusted for sediment accumulation. The project staff will have to check <br />into this. USFS staff is concerned that sediment deposition in Turquoise and Twin Lakes will <br />decrease available reservoir volume. There may also be opportunities for recovering effective <br />storage that has been lost in past year by sediment deposition. The cost of dredging may be less <br />than the cost of enlarging dams. <br /> <br />Although considerable recreation facilities would be inundated by a higher reservoir pool, none <br />are critical and all could be replaced at a higher elevation. However, these are very popular <br />recreation areas (all campgrounds are fully utilized every weekend from July 4 to Labor Day), <br />and there will be lots of public interest in any changes to these resources. <br /> <br />Wetland areas and wildlife habitat will be inundated, but it is assumed that these impacts can be <br />mitigated. <br /> <br />System operation changes and resulting impacts on Jake levels and streamflows are of concern to <br />USFS staff. Rapid changes in lake levels affect boat ramps, fisheries, and other recreational <br />amenities. Flow changes could affect fisheries. <br /> <br />Erosion is a problem in channels upstream of Turquoise Reservoir and Twin Lakes due to <br />transmountain deliveries. These create channel instability, adverse habitat impacts, and <br />contribution of high sediment loads to the reservoirs. <br /> <br />Fryingpan-Arkansas Project Re-operation. USFS has recreation facilities around Twin Lakes <br />as well as the Turquoise facilities described above. Although this alternative will not result in <br />2 of 3 <br />