Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />I. <br /> <br />.~ ".:. .~-:~. ~-:~:~ "\( <br /> <br />San Juan River <br /> <br />The San Juan River originates in southwestern Colorado and heads <br />westward through the states of New Mexico and utah until it empties <br />into Lake Powell. At the Bluff, Utah, gauge the river has a <br />drainage area of about 23,000 square miles and has varied from a <br />maximum of about 70,000 cfs in 1927 to various periods of no flow <br />during drought years. The following table lists the average annual <br />discharge at three important sites on the San Juan River, <br />Farmington, Shiprock, and Bluff for the 1935 - 1962 period prior <br />to the construction of Navajo Dam and the 1963 - 1989 period <br />following its closure: <br /> <br /> Average Annual Discharge (acre-feet) <br /> San Juan River San Juan River San Juan River <br /> at Farmington at Shiprock at Bluff <br />1935 - 1962 1,622,000 1,675,000 1,746,000 <br />1963 - 1989 1,466,000 1,460,000 1,643,000 <br /> <br />Since 1963 Navajo Dam has significantly altered the flow of the San <br />Juan River by storing the spring peak flows and releasing water <br />during the summer, fall, and winter months. As shown in Figure 10, <br />this has resulted in an approximate doubling of average winter <br />baseflows and a 45 percent decrease in the,average spring peak flow <br />at the Bluff gauge. Similar comparisons can be made at the <br />Farmington and Shiprock gauges, shown in Figures 11 and 12. <br />Consumptive use storage and deliveries and the maintenance of the <br />trout sport fishery are the primary factors for dam releases in <br />normal and dry years while the control of the spring snowmeit <br />runoff is the driving force for the releases in wet years. For the <br />purpose of analyzing the effect of the Animas-La Plata project, <br />future dam operations are expected to be consistent with historic <br />operations, 1963 through 1989. <br /> <br />Frequency analyses were performed on the historic gauge records of <br />these three San Juan River gauges to understand the probability of <br />extreme high and low flows as well as average conditions. The <br />historic gauge records are listed in Tables 2 through 4 in acre- <br />feet and in Tables 6 through 8 in cfs. These were again segregated <br />into pre-Navajo and post-Navajo periods, 1935 through 1962 and 1963 <br />through 1989. The results of these analyses have been plotted as <br />Figures 13 through 18. <br /> <br />with the project in place, the city of Bloomfield would divert <br />water from the San Juan River at a point upstream from the <br />confluence of the Animas River and the water depleted would be <br />replaced by project water from the Animas River. As a result, the <br />project would decrease the flow of the San Juan River from the <br />diversion point to the confluence of the Animas River throughout <br />the year. The previous discussion of the effects of the project <br />on the Animas River at Farmington would also apply to the San Juan <br /> <br />7 <br />