Laserfiche WebLink
<br />tlJ <br /> <br />..0 <br />..~ <br /> <br />Annual costs to Silt Project Lands <br /> <br />would then be as <br /> <br />Present <br />3600 Acres <br />Irrigated <br /> <br />follows: <br />With Project <br />6000 Acres <br />Irrigated <br /> <br />Operation and 1~intenance <br />Total <br />Per irrigated acre <br /> <br />$ 10,200 <br />2.83 <br /> <br />~13,200 <br />2.20 <br /> <br />Cost of Construction <br />Total <br />Per irrigated acre <br /> <br />o <br />o <br /> <br />23,600* <br />3.93 <br /> <br />Total Irrigation Costs <br />Total <br />per irrigated acre <br /> <br />10,200 <br />2.83 <br /> <br />36,800 <br />6.13 <br /> <br />Annual Cost to Rifle Valley participants would <br />be as follows; <br /> <br />Repayment of construction <br />25~ of 0.& M. cost for Rifle Gap <br />Reservoir <br />Total <br />Cost per acre <br /> <br />~ 7.500 <br /> 1,000 <br />'If 8,500 <br /> 7.72# <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />Based on repayment of total cost in 40 years. <br /> <br />./I, <br />Tr Based on 1,100 acres directly benefitted on I.Iidd1e Rifle <br />Creek and under Davie Ditch. <br /> <br />Repayment Ability <br /> <br />The greatest benefit to the Silt Project Lands under the <br /> <br />Harvey Gap Plan would be the increased water supply in the <br /> <br />latter part of the irrigation season, made possible by the <br /> <br />69 <br />