My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP01712
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
WSP01712
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:32:24 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:37:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8210.470
Description
Pacific Southwest Interagency Committee
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
8/15/1978
Author
PSIAC
Title
Minutes of the 78-2 Meeting - August 15-17 1978
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
163
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />B-ll <br /> <br /> <br />002790 <br /> <br />Project, one of the very first reclamation projects was initially <br />formed to serve agriculture water to 250,000 acres in what is now <br />the Phoenix Metropolitan Area. Within the last twenty-five years, <br />half of that acreage has been converted from agriculture to municipal <br />and industrial, or municipal primarily. This same sort of thing is <br />going on in other parts of the state and will in the future. The <br />fact that Arizona is the most rapidly developing state population wise <br />in the country doesn't really mean that our water requirements are <br />increasing, They are to some extent because some of this use taking <br />place on areas that were not previously in agriculture, But a lot of <br />it is and certainly once we get our policies established in the state, <br />I think that any future growth will have to be at the expense of <br />agriculture, <br /> <br />Mr. Valentine. We have ~ad alot of interest Wes as to the rate <br />of build up in deliveries to ~AP after it is in operation, do you <br />contemplate that you will be requesting full deliveries right from <br />the beginning or will you have a build up period? <br /> <br />Mr, Steiner. We will have a build up period Vern, but we expect <br />it to be very short, The first deliveries are to be made in 1985 <br />all the way down to here. This whole reach down to Florence and <br />Coolidge area deliveries are supposed to be possible by 1985 and to <br />Tucson in 1987. Now we may have some problems in getting all the <br />distribution systems in operation or ready to go into operation. <br />Most of the agriculture will drop off by the time it gets to here, <br />There are a few agricultural applicants in this area that will un- <br />doubtedly receive water. The necessity to submit the allocation <br />process to the development of environmental assessments and even <br />possibly environmental impact statements could put us in a real bind <br />as to getting the necessary contracts written and the full supply <br />to the subcontractors so that they then in turn will have time to <br />build their distribution systems by 1985. We still think it can be <br />done Vern, and certainly everybody in Arizona is interested in being <br />able to use that water immediately. But it's really too early to tell <br />how successful we will be at this. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />Mr. Valentine. Another related question is with the omission of <br />Orme Dam and some other items. Is this going to affect the ability <br />of the Central Arizona Aqueduct System to function well, or is there <br />alternatives that are being developed or what is the situation there? <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mr. Steiner. See we have not conceded that we have lost our <br />regulatory storage, The regulatory storage that was built into the <br />Central Arizona Project was at Orme. We currently are getting under- <br />way now with the Bureau of Reclamation and the Corps of Engineers <br />cooperatively in studying alternatives to the Orme Project, to the <br />initially high Orme Dam, that involve a number of other possibilities. <br />But we certainly do envision Vern, that we will have regulatory storage <br />in the system, If we were to build, if we were forced to operate the <br />Cen.ral Arlzona Project without regulatory storage, we would lose about <br />147,000 acre-feet of water supply from it. That's what is means to us. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.