My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP01712
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
WSP01712
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:32:24 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:37:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8210.470
Description
Pacific Southwest Interagency Committee
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
8/15/1978
Author
PSIAC
Title
Minutes of the 78-2 Meeting - August 15-17 1978
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
163
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />002789 <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />yield by piling the snow up decreasing the amount of water loss from <br />evaporation from the snow surface, thereby increasing the amount of <br />water that get into the streams as a natural product of the snow melt. <br />These are some of the things that can be done to increase the natural <br />water supply from a given area. These all require trade-off's in that <br />if we put snow fences on a high scenic area we have problems. There <br />are things that enter into this to restrict coal utilization in one of <br />these areas for want of production. <br /> <br />Mr, James, Did you do some trade-off analysis, at least in a <br />general way? <br /> <br />Mr, Hibbert, Not too many. 1 did give a few figures on cost that <br />are rather old and out of date but they may reflect the general cost <br />and the ratio between costs and benefits. <br /> <br />Mr. Valentine. You indicated at the earlier meetings that something <br />like twenty to twenty-five percent of the total potential is what was <br />developed in order to obtain that 750,000 acre-fet per year runoff in <br />season. <br /> <br />Mr, Hibbert, I think we indicated that roughly twenty percent of <br />the more important vegetation types would have to be managed in order <br />to get this amount. It would be higher in the Lower Basin, however. <br />Twenty percent roughly in every basin and some one-third of the area <br />had to be intensely managed in the Lower Basin to get this increase <br />that I hypothetically arrived at. Which in some cases may be stringent <br />and other cases may not be so stringent. <br /> <br />Environmental and Recreation Technical Subcommittee <br /> <br />Mr. Craig A, "Red" Giffen, Director, Area Planning and Development <br />Staff, Forest Service, Lakewood, Colorado, Chairman, reported on his <br />Subcommittee, Well Mr. Chairman, I don't really think I have anything <br />more to add beyond what Larry has said and the comments I added to <br />it at the Executive Subcommittee meeting. <br /> <br />For a copy of Mr, Giffen's report to and participation in the <br />16 August 1978 meeting of the Executive Subcommittee, see PART C - <br />ATfACHMENTS, <br /> <br />t <br /> <br />8, <br /> <br />Announcement <br /> <br />Colonel Vandenberg, Let me step back in the Agenda and bring up <br />one item that I passed over earlier. In addition to the departure of <br />Mr. Macias, we have had another long term member and supporter who <br />has departed from our ranks here, On the 14th of April this year, <br />Don Paff terminated his employment with the State of Nevada and he <br />is therefore no longer Nevada's representative on our Committee. I <br />would suggest that because of the great level support we received <br />from Don Paff in the past, it might be appropriate for the Chairman, <br />whoever he might be at the time, necessary to sign, send a resolution <br />to Mr, Paff similar to the one we are sending to Phil Macias. <br /> <br />B-9 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.