Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Mr. Valentine. The Committee may be interested in the conclusions <br />Ron, You could g1ve them a run down on what your findings were. <br /> <br />Mr, Alden R. Hibbert. Well, I looked at the possibility of <br />generating augmented water supply in the C~lorado River Bas~n throu?h <br />Vegetation Management and Snow Management 1n the Colorado R1ver Bas1n, <br />Doth the Upper and Lower Basins separately. The overall consensus is <br />probably research and application studies. If every acre of land <br />were managed for specifically water yield, a great deal of water could <br />be generated, at least on site, In the final analysis however, the <br />application of such measures to land is rather extreme and something <br />much less than this would be the final result. Land managers' view- <br />point, water yield must be taken in perspective and the trade~off <br />recognized with other land uses, Thus the more realistic level of <br />management for water yield is something for less than the maximum <br />potential, I used, as an example, to generate water, say, 750,000 <br />acre-feet, what would have to be done to generate that much water? <br />This is only a hypothetical example of what would be necessary <br />to get it, this doesn't mean this would be a recommended or a realistic <br />level of management, but I did use this as an exan~le of what would <br />be required to get it and outlined this in the report. The land <br />manager must then look at these and ~ith other priorities in mind, <br />say whether or not such a level would be reached. I didn't arrive <br />at any conclusions to this but it does give something to look at <br />and the land manager can say, well, it's still too high or this <br />could be reached or it may be exceeded. But at least it's a place <br />which to look at, a level of management that mayor may not be reached. <br />That's about where this particular report is now. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mr. James, What would be some examples of management strategies, <br />alternative strategies for increasing the yield? <br /> <br />Mr, Hibbert, Would you reframeyour question? <br /> <br />Mr. James. What would be some examples of the management strategies <br />that you would use? <br /> <br />Mr. Hibbert, Okay, for example there are several million acres <br />of Aspen in the Colorado River Basin. If this Aspen type is to be <br />kept in the ecosystem, some type of management or fire or natural <br />regeneration of the particular type eventually has to be done and in <br />doing so, water can be one of the spin-off resources of the system, <br />either by clear cutting and allowing to regenerate say on an eighty- <br />five year cycle which would allow timber harvest to be part of the <br />management of the ecosystem, or maybe shortening the rotation age to <br />twenty-five years to enhance wildlife habitat. Increasing the browse <br />production from its system. This would increase water yield even more. <br />But there are various ways in which these vegetation types can be <br />managed. In the wind swept Alpine Zone, mountain grasslands, sage <br />brush in some areas, snow fencing might be a way to increase water <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />B-8 <br />