My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP01593
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
WSP01593
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:31:47 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:32:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.127.J
Description
Savery-Pot Hook Project
Basin
Yampa/White
Water Division
6
Date
1/1/1964
Author
Kearl W. G.
Title
The Savery-Pot Hook Reclamation Project: Analysis of Economic Effects on Existing Ranches & New Farm Units
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~ <br />0') <br />l'- <br /> <br />- 21 - <br /> <br />Adding additional project land to eJ(istin~ units Hould result in a substantial <br /> <br />increase in labor requirements and mif'ht make feasible some father-son type of <br /> <br />business arrangements in the area. This Hould provide an opportunity for youn~ <br /> <br />people to start in farminp and ranching locally. Thus, adding additional land to <br /> <br />a presently operatinf' unit would not necessarily mean that the entire resource would <br /> <br />be for the support of a sinrle farm operator. It mipht be that two or even more <br /> <br />families would operate an integrated farm unit. They mi~ht do so much more efficient- <br /> <br />ly than a present ranch unit, or a self-contained new farm unit in the project area <br /> <br />could be operated independently. <br /> <br />The case-study ranches analyzed were all in a strong capital position. In- <br /> <br />debtedness on these ranches ranged from zero to about $20,000. Equities in the ex- <br /> <br />isting ranches would make it relatively eaSY for these operators to obtain financing <br /> <br />to develop additional land, as well as having the advantage of a "going concern" to <br /> <br />provide some income during the development period. There would be a reduced invest- <br /> <br />rnent requirement for the new units since complete lines of buildings, improvements, <br /> <br />and machinery would not be required. <br /> <br />Another important asrect and advantage in alloHing development in conjunction <br /> <br />with existing units is in the inherent flexibility and security Hhich it would afford <br /> <br />against possible water shortages. In years of shortage the ranch units, as outlined, <br /> <br />with a feeder enterprise on pasture, would be able to dispose of the feeder cattle <br /> <br />as "warmed-up" or heavy feeders. They would then be released from the necessity of <br /> <br />spreading a limited water supply over all available acreage of both croplands and <br /> <br />pasture. This ability to adjust feed requirements to available supplies by adjusting <br /> <br />numbers or length of time for the feeder calves on pasture, would result in relative- <br /> <br />ly stable operations. The adjustmeut would be more difficult if it required reduc- <br /> <br />tion in breeding cow nurrbers, as would occur with a beef-cow calf enterprise on <br /> <br />pasture. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.