My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP01593
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
WSP01593
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:31:47 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:32:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.127.J
Description
Savery-Pot Hook Project
Basin
Yampa/White
Water Division
6
Date
1/1/1964
Author
Kearl W. G.
Title
The Savery-Pot Hook Reclamation Project: Analysis of Economic Effects on Existing Ranches & New Farm Units
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />(X) <br />0") <br />~ <br /> <br />- 22 - <br /> <br />Even if the project is developed so as to allow for the greatest amount of <br /> <br />flexibility on the fams in meeting I~ater shortages, it will still be very important <br /> <br />for the development to be limited to that size for Nhich the Nater supply is ade- <br /> <br />quate. The development should be carried out in stares only as it becomes completely <br /> <br />clear that the water supply would be adequate. <br /> <br />The possibilities of obtaining additional land, or even supplemental water for <br /> <br />all acrea~e on existin~ units is dependent upon some change in present reclamation <br /> <br />law rerardinp size restrictions. Many ranches in the Little Snake River Valley <br /> <br />presently have irrigated lands in excess of present acrea~e limitations. <br /> <br />In considering possible benefits from the project on existing ranches, it has <br /> <br />been assumed that productivity and efficiency would be increased or remain the same <br /> <br />as at present. Some increase in labor requirements is possible because of a change <br /> <br />in irrigation methods and practices. Reservoir storage will result in reducing <br /> <br />river floN in the spring of the year, and controlled irrigation requiring more labor <br /> <br />Iii 11 be necessary. Less "1~i1d flooding," which is economic in labor use, will occur. <br /> <br />It is possible that some costs of operation may be increased for existing <br /> <br />ranches. Many ranches in the area are operatin~ on a combination of deeded land, <br /> <br />leases of privately owned lands, and Bureau of Land Management and National Forest <br /> <br />permits. One may assume that the Federal range permits are securely held. However, <br /> <br />competi tion for leasinp of privately oNned lands would probably increase as a result <br /> <br />of new farm mits in the area, with possible consequent increase in costs of leasing. <br /> <br />Any increase in these costs for existin!, ranches \~ould T'artially offset benefits to <br /> <br />existing ranches from the project. <br /> <br />Losses in productivity could also occur if irripation of new lands results in <br /> <br />any drainage problems on existing lands or creates any salinity or alkali problems. <br /> <br />Possible detrimental effects such as these are conjectural, and their investigation <br /> <br />is beyond the scope of this study. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.