My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP01562
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
WSP01562
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:31:39 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:32:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.700
Description
Colorado River
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
7/3/1991
Author
Colorado Forum
Title
A Synopsis: The Upper Colorado River Basin - Colorado's Water Interests
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />f. <br /> <br />CAN METRO DENVER GET THERE THROUGH CONSERVATION ALONE? <br /> <br />Professor John Morris' analysis of water conservation, as it relates to <br />the DWD's next 30 years, has proposed demand reduction methods <br />including universal metering, shower flow and toilet flush reduction <br />technology, recycling, and a progressive pricing system. Morris <br />believes that universal metering and a progressive pricing system alone <br />would provide 2/3 of the savings through conservation. <br /> <br />Although there is obviously a relationship between price and usage it <br />takes sizable reductions in usage and raises a profound philosophical <br />question: should rates be used to further social purposes or should <br />they be a function of cost only? <br /> <br />88,000 unmetered houses represent 2/3 of the Department's customers <br />within the City and County of Denver. They account for an estimated <br />1/4 of water delivered by the entire Denver water operation. Studies <br />indicate rather conclusively that metering does reduce water usage and <br />is cost effective. Clearly, metering needs to be undertaken whether by <br />a gradual process through change of home ownership or by a more direct <br />"buy-in" approach paid for by the DWD which would recover the cost by <br />selling the water saved to other users. <br /> <br />AUGMENTATION OF SURFACE WATER SUPPLIES <br /> <br />While most of the attention of Coloradoans has traditionally been <br />focused on storage and diversion from surface streams, two approaches <br />which could conceivably augment surface supplies have largely been <br />ignored: groundwater and manipulation of snowpack. Both should be <br />subject to far more attention and investigation. <br /> <br />In Metro Denver, for example, rather than overbuilding surface supply <br />capacity for an occasional dry year, it may be possible to develop a <br />system of accessing ground water to make up the short fall. <br /> <br />Together with such techniques as cloud-seeding, snowpack manipulation <br />may contain a significant key to Colorado's water future. <br /> <br />Il METRO DENVER WATER COOPERATION <br />~: <br /> <br />Since approval of the "Poundstone" Amendment to Colorado's Constitution <br />in the 70's, Denver has been cut off from expanding its boundaries. <br />What growth Denver can expect within its boundaries can easily be <br />accommodated within the existing treatment and supply capacity; thus, <br />future expansion can primarily be intended to benefit suburbs. It is <br />not surprising, then, that funding the expansion of the Denver Water <br />system becomes a momentous issue. <br /> <br />What if the voters of Denver no longer chose to approve future <br />expansion via the bond route as they have done in the past? The <br />suburbs and Denver are currently working on developing an arrangement <br />by which suburbia can participate in initial capitalization of new <br />projects. <br /> <br />- 7 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.