Laserfiche WebLink
<br />,'".. <br />,- <br />ii,':, <br />f' <br /> <br />, <br />i <br />I <br />, <br /> <br />'. <br />,. <br /> <br />:\ <br /> <br />~; <br /> <br />Aesthetics aside, minimum stream flow is crucial to natural habitat. <br />Also, as stream flows drop the impact on human works such as irrigation <br />structures and water treatment plants increases. Potable water guality <br />is also affected. <br /> <br />Decreasing flows by transmountain or other diversion does increase <br />river salinity. The Colorado Water Conservation Board's best estimate <br />is that present diversions of almost 540,000 acre-feet, annually, <br />increase salinity levels at Imperial Dam in the lower Basin by almost <br />5lmg/1. <br /> <br />These concerns -- salinity, wilderness, natural habitat, effect on <br />waste water treatment plants, etc. -- are both separate and concurrent <br />issues which, with proper planning and intelligent management, are <br />amenable to compromise and resolution. Yet the overriding issue -- <br />that water taken out of the Basin and transported across the mountains <br />will not be returned to its original basin -- may not be resolved <br />unless compensatory benefits are accepted in lieu of water. <br /> <br />A BASIS FOR COMPROMISE ACROSS THE CONTINENTAL DIVIDE <br /> <br />Is there room for compromise between the Eastern and Western Slope on <br />high country water storage from the Colorado Mainstem? <br /> <br />In the absence of such compromise, Colorado may one day face a water <br />crisis of mammoth proportions. Fortunately, the possibility of joint <br />effort between the two slopes appears more favorable than it has for <br />years, though the distance to be covered remains long. <br /> <br />In sum, any future transbasin diversions must yield joint benefits for <br />the two slopes. A case in point is ""Windy Gap", the 1980 agreement <br />between the Municipal Subdistrict of the Northern Colorado Water <br />Conservancy District and Western Slope water interests. Water users on <br />the west side of the Continental Divide receive significant <br />compensatory benefits while Eastern Slope cities as well as the Platte <br />River Power Authority receive the benefit of a 54,000 acre-feet <br />diversion. <br /> <br />A practical approach on the part of the DWB might include: (1) A full <br />commitment to reach the demand reduction goals of the Foothills <br />Agreement; (2) construction of those projects -- a "Two Forks TYpe" <br />dam, Straight Creek, the extension of Williams Fork, and enlargement of <br />Gross Reservoir -- which do not involve major transmountain diversion; P' <br />and (3) then, a realistic assessment of just how much water actually is <br />needed from across the Continental Divide. <br /> <br />") <br /> <br />If additional diversion is needed, the DWB might pursue the least <br />costly and environmentally damaging diversion -- the East Gore Unit <br />which gets water form Blue River tributaries. Then, there will need be <br />a compromise with the headwater counties by not pursuing Eagle-Piney or <br />Eagle-Colorado until after 2010 and only after a joint assessment of <br />the need is completed a decade or so hence. <br /> <br />- 6 - <br />