My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP01562
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
WSP01562
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:31:39 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:32:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.700
Description
Colorado River
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
7/3/1991
Author
Colorado Forum
Title
A Synopsis: The Upper Colorado River Basin - Colorado's Water Interests
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />.',. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />r' <br />\It <br />~1 <br />t <br />r <br />,. <br />~, <br /> <br />r,'...,', <br />., <br />il <br /> <br />" <br />i' <br />" <br /> <br />l <br /> <br />'" <br /> <br />The Dwa does have a responsibility to future Metro growth -- no other <br />municipality can duplicate the extremely expensive structure -- or the <br />existing water claims -- developed by the DWB; it must be the center of <br />any rational plan to develop and store additional water for the <br />Metropolitan area. <br /> <br />DOWNSTREAM: HOW THE LOWER BASIN VIEWS ITS OWN UPHILL BATTLES <br /> <br />Even though Colorado stands at the "head of the ditch", the private and <br />public viewpoints of our neighbor and potential rival over water -- <br />Arizona -- are very important. <br /> <br />Arizona is not significantly concerned about Colorado's use of Upper <br />Colorado entitlements. It does, however, keep an eagle eye on energy <br />development and other growth of water users in Western Colorado. Its <br />attitude is that Western Colorado will never be able to use Colorado's <br />unused River entitlements, and growth in the Front Range Colorado could <br />not possibly utilize anything near 500,000 acre-feet additionally in <br />the next 30 years. Thus, Colorado is not perceived as a threat to full <br />utilization of CAP in Arizona. <br /> <br />The official position within Arizona's water policy offices is that <br />every state needs to develop a statewide integrated water policy of its <br />own. Colorado would do well to follow Arizona's example and use its <br />experience as a model in setting up Colorado's statewide policy. <br /> <br />'I <br /> <br />.v <br /> <br />When Colorado finds a way to unify its own water management, Arizona <br />might be a welcome neighbor in relation to the pragmatic answers <br />required to balance development and utilization of the Colorado River's <br />resources. <br /> <br />IN CONCLUSION <br /> <br />Water conflicts will no doubt continue under present State policies. <br />What is abundantly clear, if history is any guide, is that "available" <br />water in the State will be developed by someone, whether in Colorado or <br />Downstream in neighboring states. The history of semi-arid societies <br />is clear: they use the water available to them. <br /> <br />Equal to the need for water development is the need to use water as <br />efficiently as possible; for no matter how much water Colorado diverts, <br />it won't be enough as long as water is not used with a focus on <br />conservation. <br /> <br />What is not folly is to insist water development be pursued in such <br />manner as to be least damaging to the environment. A balance can be <br />reached; society's technical and engineering expertise has advanced to <br />the point mitigation measurers can insure the coexistence of natural <br />life with the human need for water. <br /> <br />- 8 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.