Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />001512 <br /> <br />4.0 Farm Efficiency Adjustments <br /> <br /> <br />The Level A analysis crop budgets assume farm efficiencies equal <br /> <br /> <br />to that of a contiguous 1000 acre operation. That is, it was assumed <br /> <br /> <br />that at least 1000 acres could be farmed using one equipment <br /> <br /> <br />complement stored in a central equipment warehouse without excessive <br /> <br /> <br />transportation costs. In the Level B economic analysis, two types of <br /> <br /> <br />farm efficiency adjustments were made for certain parcels. The first <br /> <br /> <br />adjustment was for economies of scale where there were fewer than 600 <br /> <br /> <br />acres of current or newly irrigated new acreage that could be farmed <br /> <br /> <br />as one unit. The 600 acre cutoff figure was used because economies of <br /> <br /> <br />scale decline rather steeply below this point. <br /> <br /> <br />A second type of adjustment for some parcels involved <br /> <br /> <br />transportation costs for on-farm equipment. These adjustments were <br /> <br /> <br />made in cases where isolated parcels could not be easily served out of <br /> <br /> <br />a central equipment warehouse. In cases where individual parcels were <br /> <br /> <br />more than five miles from the assumed location of a central equipment <br /> <br /> <br />warehouse, an additional transportation cost for transporting <br /> <br /> <br />equipment to and from the parcel from a central location was assumed. <br /> <br /> <br />The effects of these adjustments on the parcels identified as <br /> <br /> <br />preliminary PIA in the Animas and Florida drainages are given in the <br /> <br /> <br />following sections. <br /> <br /> <br />5.0 Results of Level B Analysis for Animas and Florida Drainages <br /> <br /> <br />Boyle Engineering's Task D and E Report for the Animas and <br /> <br /> <br />Florida Watersheds, dated May, 1986, identifies six parcels as having <br /> <br /> <br />preliminary repayment capacities high enough to justify water delivery <br /> <br /> <br />charges. All of these parcels are currently unirrigated, but show the <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br /><' <br />