Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />001513 <br /> <br />potential for having the benefits of irrigation exceed the costs of <br /> <br /> <br />converting them to irrigated agricultural use. <br /> <br /> <br />Five of these parcels are in the Animas Drainage, and constitute <br /> <br /> <br />a total of approximately 374 acres. In addition, Boyle Engineering <br /> <br /> <br />identified an additional 313 acres of currently irrigated lands in the <br /> <br /> <br />Animas Drainage, bringing the total potential PIA in that drainage to <br /> <br /> <br />approximately 687 acres. (Tqble D.8, Animas and Florida Watersheds <br /> <br /> <br />Task D and E Report, Draft No.2, Boyle Engineering Corporation, May, <br /> <br /> <br />1986.) Only one 29 acre unirrigated parcel was classified as <br /> <br /> <br />potential PIA in the Florida Watershed. However, Boyle Engineering <br /> <br /> <br />also identified approximately 700 acres of currently irrigated lands <br /> <br /> <br />in the Florida Watershed, bringing total potential PIA to 729 acres in <br /> <br /> <br />that drainage. Thus, there is enough irrigated or potentially <br /> <br /> <br />irrigable land in each watershed to achieve economies of scale similar <br /> <br /> <br />to the 1000 acre operation assumed in the Level A analysis. <br /> <br /> <br />The potentially irrigable parcels in both drainages are listed in <br /> <br /> <br />Table 5-1, along with a description of the characteristics of each <br /> <br /> <br />parcel. The first four columns of Table 5-1 give the parcel number, <br /> <br /> <br />net irrigable acres, land class and climatic zone descriptions for <br /> <br /> <br />each parcel. The fifth column of Table 5-1, entitled "Cropping <br /> <br /> <br />Pattern Suitability", provides an indication of whether the cropping <br /> <br /> <br />pattern that maximizes repayment capacity is suitable for the land <br /> <br /> <br />class of the individual parcel under consideration. Column six of <br /> <br /> <br />Table 5-1 provides a description of the percentage amount of tree <br /> <br /> <br />canopy on each parcel, and column seven provides a description of the <br /> <br /> <br />parcel's distance from the theoretical central location of a farm <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />'."~ <br />