My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP01521
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
WSP01521
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:31:28 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:30:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8443.400
Description
Narrows Unit Reports
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
6/15/1974
Author
US DOL BOR
Title
Draft Social Assessment of the Proposed Narrows Unit and Alternatives Thereto
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
263
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />0343 <br /> <br />communities. One group of three interviewers went to the <br /> <br /> <br />Valley area in late April; a second group of four interviewers <br /> <br /> <br />returned to the Valley in early June. In all, about twenty <br /> <br /> <br />man days were spent interviewing directly in the Valley. In <br /> <br /> <br />addition, interviews were conducted in Denver with various <br /> <br /> <br />relevant expert informants and actor groups with advocacy <br /> <br /> <br />positions on the building of the dam. Finally, a great deal <br /> <br /> <br />of secondary data was gathered and organized from public <br /> <br /> <br />records (e.g., data on housing, census, employment, industry, <br /> <br /> <br />etc.). The result is that well over 100 interviews were con- <br /> <br /> <br />ducted with expert informants. Most of the farms and many <br /> <br /> <br />homes in the Hardin and Narrows flood pools were interviewed. <br /> <br /> <br />In all, a few dozen interviews of residents of the surrounding <br /> <br /> <br />communities were completed. <br /> <br /> <br />It is especially important to note that this interview- <br /> <br /> <br />ing strategy differs in a couple of ways from more traditional <br /> <br /> <br />national sampling techniques. This is true for specific rea- <br /> <br /> <br />sons. In the first place, the concern of the assessment is <br /> <br /> <br />with obtaining relevant, accurate and comprehensive information <br /> <br /> <br />on probable social impacts; it is not with obtaining a "proba- <br /> <br /> <br />bilistic sample." The objective of the study is not to be able <br /> <br /> <br />to talk about percentage of people supporting the project, but <br /> <br /> <br />rather to draw some conclusion about the likely social impacts <br /> <br /> <br />of the projects. This distinction is important for two reasons. <br /> <br /> <br />First, the extent to which a person believes something will <br /> <br /> <br />happen is not necessarily related directly to its actual proba- <br /> <br /> <br />bility of occurrence. Second, by being able to match objective <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />n <br /> <br />32 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.