Laserfiche WebLink
<br />0321 <br /> <br />At this point, we have identified one critical aspect <br />of conducting a social assessment -- namely, what is the <br />philosophy, content and general direction to be taken. <br />In reality, there are four types of analyses which contribute <br />to the achievement of a social assessment. These include a <br />disaggregate analysis of social impacts at a somewhat micro <br />level; an integrated analysis "across" many areas of interest; <br />an aggregated analysis at the higher or macro social levels of <br />quality of life, social well being, and relative social position; <br />and, a synthesized analysis wherein the social assessment varia- <br />bles are considered to include the socio-economic and socio- <br />environmental consequences as well. These constitute four <br />distinct generic forms of analysis: disaggregation. integra- <br />tion, aggregation and synthesis. A few comments on each are <br />warranted. <br /> <br /> <br />As will be detailed in Section 1.3, social impacts in <br /> <br /> <br />this assessment are disaggregated into 23 separate areas of <br /> <br /> <br />analysis(e.g., educational effects, employment effects, etc.). <br /> <br /> <br />At this disaggregated level, a variety of parallel but separate <br /> <br /> <br />analyses are feasible. Once each of these is completed, the <br /> <br /> <br />second form of analysis, involving integration across these <br /> <br /> <br />areas becomes possible. Here, it is important to note that <br /> <br /> <br />the analysis is still at the disaggregate level, but the data <br /> <br /> <br />can be organized into a format for comparing alternatives <br /> <br /> <br />across many different areas of impact. The third type of <br /> <br /> <br />analysis involves an aggregation up to a more macro level <br /> <br /> <br />namely our three social assessment conceptual groupings. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />(; <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />16 <br />