My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP01376
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
WSP01376
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:30:45 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:21:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8142.700
Description
Trinidad Project - Annual Operating Plans and Reports
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
12/1/1988
Author
US DoI BoR
Title
Review of Operating Principles Final Report
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Operating Principles/Plan
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
610
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />?:2.'.ri. <br /> <br />5R <br /> <br />1HO.1 thru 1H1.0 <br /> <br />5HO.1 thru 5HO.3 <br /> <br />1R01. thru 1R1.0 <br /> <br />5RO.1 thru 5R1.0 <br /> <br />lH39 <br /> <br />lR39 <br /> <br />joint-use pool until full and then stored in Model <br />reserv6ir storage right. Model reservoir storage <br />right content transferred to joint-use pool at end <br />of October (subject to space availability). <br />Compares the effect of Tri ni dad Project operat i on <br />to that of historical Model reservoir operation. <br /> <br />Same as 5H except compares the effect of Trinidad <br />Project operation to that of rehabi 1 itated Model <br />reservoir operation. <br /> <br />Operational criteria the same as the baseline study <br />except headgate i rri gat ion di vers ions were assumed <br />to be greater t~an the computed ideal requirement. <br />Runs were made for 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.5 and 1.0 foot <br />per acre of excess diversion. The additional water <br />for diversion was assumed to have occurred during <br />years when Trinidad Reservoir inflow was above <br />average for the 1925-1957 period. The return flow <br />from the additional diversion above ideal require- <br />ment was assumed' to be 60 percent. Resu 1 ts of each <br />run compares the effect of Trinidad Project opera- <br />tion to that of historical Model reservoir opera- <br />tion. ' <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Operat i ona 1 criteri a the same as 5H except headga- <br />te irri9ation diversions were assumed to exceed <br />the computed ideal requi rements. Runs were made <br />for 0.1,0.2 and 0.3 foot per acre of excess diver- <br />sion. The additional diversion was assumed to have <br />occurred during years when inflow to Trinidad <br />Reservoi r was ,above average for the 1925-1957 <br />peri od. Return' f1 ow from the increment di vers i on <br />above ideal was assumed to return at a rate of 60 <br />percent in the following month of diversion. <br />Results of each run compares the effect of <br />Trinidad PrOject operation to that of historical <br />Model reservoir ,operation. <br /> <br />Same as lHO.1thru 1H1.0 described above except <br />effect of Trinidad Project operation is compared to <br />that of rehabilitated Model reservoir operation. <br /> <br />Same as 5HO.1thru 5HO.3 described above except <br />effect of Trinidad Project operation is compared to <br />that of rehabilitated Model reservoir operation. <br /> <br />All operational criteria similar to baseline study <br />except the maxi!mum joint-use pool is, 39,000 acre- <br />feet rather th~n the previous 19,500 acre-feet. <br />Compares the effect of Trinidad Project operation <br />to that of historical Model reservoir operation. <br /> <br />Same as 1H39 except compares the effect of Trinidad <br />Project ope rat ion to that of rehabil i tated Mode 1 <br />reservoir opera~ion. <br />18! <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.