Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />180':' <br /> <br />Economic and Financial Analyses <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Assessed value <br /> <br />1960 <br />1961 <br />1962 <br />1963 <br />1964 <br />1965 <br /> <br />$67,990,000 <br />67,086,000 <br />66,009,000 <br />67,735,000 <br />65,999,000 <br />68,553,000 <br /> <br />The 1965 figure reflects a reversal of the reported decline in <br />values in recent years which was due mainly to substantial decreases <br />in the value of petroleum reserves, especially in Morgan County, <br />which more than offset nominal gains in other agricul tural areas and <br />in urban centers. The declining value for the generally depleted <br />oil reserves probably has run its course so that some gains in the <br />assessed value of the Lower South Platte Water Conservancy District <br />may be anticipated in the future. For purposes of repayment analysis <br />the future assessed valuation when Narrows Unit begins operation is <br />estimated at $70,000,000. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Under Colorado law, the conservancy district may levy an ad <br />valorem tax of one mill annually when construction of the Narrows <br />Unit is completed and supplemental irrigation water becomes available <br />from the Narrows Reservoir. Est~ted annual revenue of $70,000 from <br />the one mill levy will first be used to defray administrative expenses <br />of the district. These administrative expenses include costs of <br />maintaining office headquarters, salaries, payments for travel and <br />service by members of the board of directors as prescribed by state <br />law, and other necessary expenses. The total annual district expense <br />has been estimated at $43,000, or about 61 percent of the total <br />proceeds from the mill levy. The remaining annual proceeds of $27,000, <br />or about 39 percent, would be applicable to the payment of allocated <br />irrigation costs of the Narrows Unit. <br /> <br />Since the taxing powers of the Lower South Platte Water <br />Conservancy District are limited, the expected net revenues from <br />the levy on its assessed valuation will aid in amortizing the allocated <br />irrigation costs only to a relatively small extent. Consequently, the <br />major portion of the payments by the district to the Government must <br />be obtained from the water users. <br /> <br />Contracts with individual water users, irrigation companies, and <br />municipalities have been used in underwriting the costs of supplemental <br />water from the Colorado-Big Thompson Project and they provide the <br />basis for annual assessment of C-BT Project charges by the Northern <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />104 <br />