Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />. <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />.' <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />CONCLUSIONS <br /> <br />1. No firm power will be available to private utilities from <br /> <br />the Colorado River Storage Project. <br /> <br />2. The preference customers in the States of Colorado, New <br /> <br />Mexico, Utah, Wyoming and Arizona can by 1970, or only five years after <br /> <br />the first project power becomes available, absorb all the firm power. <br /> <br />3. By 1975 the preference users in the States of Colorado, <br /> <br />New Mexico, Utah and Wyoming, exclusive of Arizona, can absorb ap- <br /> <br />proximately 80% of the firm power available. <br /> <br />4. By not later than 1980 the states of Colorado, New Mexico, <br /> <br />Utah and Wyoming can alone absorb all of the project firm power. <br /> <br />5. Assuming supply to preference customers in Arizona, at <br /> <br />no time would the private utilities be called upon to absorb any project <br /> <br />power to insure project repayment. <br /> <br />6. The transmission system as shown on Exhibits 1, 2 and <br /> <br />3 will: <br /> <br />(a) Be wholly federally owned, <br />(b) Serve all important preference eustomer load centers, <br /> <br />and <br /> <br />(c) Interconnect the Federal power systems of the Colo- <br /> <br />rado River Storage Project with those in the lower basin area of the Col- <br /> <br />orado River and the Western Division of the Missouri Basin thus permit- <br /> <br />ting full integration to the benefit of Reclamation repayment obligations <br /> <br />and customer cost of power. <br /> <br />7. Although 345 KV lines are considered adequate from an <br /> <br />engineering standpoint it is believed, unless conditions not here considered <br /> <br />- 2 - <br />