Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />,I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />PROPOSED FEDERAL TRANSMISSION SYSTEM <br /> <br />Three maps, attached as Exhibits 1, 2, and 3, indicate basic <br /> <br />transmission requirements for the purpose of (1) carrying Colorado <br /> <br />River Storage Project power to load centers where it can be taken by <br /> <br />preference customers, (2) interconnecting the various proposed hydro- <br /> <br />electric developments of the project to allow integration and maximum <br /> <br />production of these resources and (31 interconnecting over Federal lines <br /> <br />with adjoining Federal systems to achieve greatest latitude in interchange <br /> <br />and standby. <br />The three maps show transmission lines which are anticipated <br /> <br />as being required not later than 1970, 1975 and 1980 respectively for the <br /> <br />distribution of loads assumed. In order to meet generation programs, a <br /> <br />major part of the lines shown in 1970 will actually be required by 1965 or <br /> <br />earlier. Existing Federal transmission facilities are shown in heavy <br /> <br />lines, existing private utility facilities in lighter lines and proposed <br /> <br />Colorado River Storage Project facilities in lines of various colors de- <br /> <br />pending upon transmission voltage. Obviously the indicated system will <br /> <br />be subject to modification when final power allocations are made but such <br /> <br />modifications are not anticipated to materially alter overall costs. The <br /> <br />system is also well adapted to expansion to connect other potential but <br /> <br />presently unauthorized hydroelectric developments in the project area, <br /> <br />none of which have been assumed as potential resources in this report. <br /> <br />As an example, if three 230 KV transmission lines are con- <br /> <br />structed as shown to carry up to 525 megawatts to Arizona in 1970 and <br /> <br />the permissible flow is reduced in succeeding years, one or two of these <br /> <br />lines can be assigned to the Marble Canyon development. This development <br /> <br />- 10 - <br />