Laserfiche WebLink
<br />This gives Western and the customer 2 more years than the <br /> <br />August 1983 proposal to est~blish satisfactory contract <br /> <br />1 anguage. <br /> <br />11. The cri teri a now state that contract ri ghts would <br />automatically expire if means to receive and distribute <br />power are not acquired by September 30, 1988 unless Western <br />agrees otherwise in writing. <br /> <br />For the potential applicants' convenience, hypothetical <br />allocations are being published: with this notice that assume that <br />all qualified applicants fOl'l1lalily submit an application, that all <br />existing customers demonstrate 'compliance with the spirit of the <br />resale of electric energy article, that all allottees desire <br />power with energy at load factors equal to the seasonal factor of. <br />the resource pools involved, and that no requests to exchange <br />resources from season to season were received. These allocation <br />tables (Appendix C of criteria) are examples only and should not <br />be interpreted as Western's proposed or final allocations. <br /> <br />B. Major Issues <br />1. Eligibility Requirements -r Application of the Preference <br />Laws. <br /> <br />In the FEDERAL REGISTER nqtice of August 23, 1983, Western <br />proposed that resources w~uld be allocated in accordance with <br />preference provisions of ~eclamation law in the following <br />, <br /> <br />order of priority: (1) pteference entities in the market <br /> <br />8 <br />