Laserfiche WebLink
<br />" <br /> <br />area; (2) preference entities outside the market area; and <br />(3) nonpreference entities in the market area. In addition, <br />to be eligible for an allocation the preference entity must <br />be an electric utility or otherwise eligible for CRSP power <br />pursuant to 1 aw. un 1 ess it is a F edera 1 or State ultimate <br />consumer load of a defined type. <br /> <br />(a) COll1l1ents: <br /> <br />Western should change its proposed criteria to treat <br /> <br />the Utah Power & Light Company (UP&L) on the same <br /> <br />basis as other applicants for power. <br /> <br />Preference laws are an anachronism and are <br />unconstitutional as applied by Western. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Preference status should be granted to the 143 cities, <br />counties and towns who have applied for power through. <br />UP&L. <br /> <br />Preference laws have continuing validity and are <br />consti tuti ona 1. <br /> <br />Preference status should be limited to nonprofit <br />entities that assume utility responsibility. <br /> <br />Criteria should be adopted for deciding among <br />conflicting applications made by preference entities. <br /> <br />9 <br />