My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00596
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00596
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:26:49 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 9:50:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8276.200
Description
Paradox Valley Unit - Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Project
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
4
Date
7/7/1986
Title
Finding of No Significant Impact For Deep-Well Injection Testing Program
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
EIS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Short-term <br />Resource effects <br />Local econany yes <br /> <br />Housing yes <br />pcpulation yes <br />Services yes <br />Energy yes <br />Scenery yes <br /> <br />Air & noise yes <br /> <br />Water yes <br /> <br />vegetation yes <br /> <br />wildlife yes <br /> <br />Fish no <br />Endangered no <br />species <br />Recreation yes <br />proposed yes <br />wilderness <br />Study Area <br />Proposed yes <br />wild and <br />Scenic Rivers <br />Cultural no <br />resources <br /> <br />Table 1 <br />Short- and Long-Term Effects <br />Resulting Fran Recarrrended Plan <br />Relationship of short-term <br />Long-term use of environment and <br />effects long-term productivity <br />no Forty person years of employrrent (8 in <br />FY-86 , 20 in FY-87, 6 in FY 88, and 6 in FY 89) <br />would generate $1,196,000 in salaries during the <br />4-year construction and monitoring period. <br />Construction would have a positive, <br />though minimal, effect on the local econany. <br />no Adequate housing or trailer spaces would be <br />available in the local communities. <br />no Approximately 37 people, including construction <br />workers, would be in the unit area during the <br />peak year of construction. <br />no The construction force and their families would <br />have a minimal effect on services. <br />no The energy for vehicles and IlI3chinery would be <br />short-term commitments of resources. <br />yes Visual effects would exist for the life of the <br />unit, or longer, until facilities were removed <br />and the landscape restored. The facilities will <br />be designed to blend with the surrounding area <br />as much as possible. <br />no These qualities would both degrade slightly but <br />would remain within leqal standards. <br />no The operation of the system during the test <br />period would periodically reduce river flow <br />approximately 1.5 cis or 1,086 acre-feet annually. <br />no Fourteen acres of vegetation would be disturbed <br />during construction; landscaping and reseeding <br />after construction would offset these <br />losses. Net loss of less than 10 acres. <br />no During construction, short-term decreases of <br />local populations of small IlI3mmals and birds <br />would occur. Long-term losses to populations <br />would be minimal. <br />no The test would improve the water quality that <br />would improve the fisheries habitat. <br /> <br />no <br /> <br />yes See Scenery, Air, and Noise Above. <br />no During construction, there would be minor visual <br />and audio effects. <br /> <br />no During construction, there would be minor visual <br />and audio effects. <br /> <br />no The unit would not disturb any significant <br />cultural resources. <br /> <br />17 <br /> <br />00 59 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.