My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00291
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00291
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:13:35 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 9:37:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8278.400
Description
Title I - Mexican Treaty
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
3/1/1962
Author
IBWC
Title
Mexican Water Treaty -Appendix B - Water Quality A Missing
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />"We can expect the agricultural econamy in Arizona to. be <br />more or less the same as in the Imperial Valley. We can expect <br />the return flaw to be mare ar less parallel with the use, with same <br />slight lag. Therefore there would came to the stream in the winter- <br />time by virtue af the relatively high winter use, return flaw which <br />wauld exceed the actual requirements af Mexico. an accaunt of <br />the lesser use af water in the wintertime in Mexico.. In arder that <br />the United States might receive credit far such winter return <br />there is placed in the treaty a minimum schedule. There is scheduled <br />in the treaty itself 900,000 acre-feet af the 1,500,000 acre-feet, <br />and the winter schedule is sa designed as to fairly encampass <br />the return flaw that might came to the stream belaw the last paint <br />af diversian in the United States, in arder that we might receive <br />credit far it, whether Mexico. uses it ar nat. I will say that that <br />was nat entirely inequitable sa far as Mexico. is cancerned, <br />because I think it is the desire af Mexico. to increase her uses <br />in the wintertime and build up a better agricultural ecanamy, by <br />the raising of winter craps. Mexican negatiatars so stated to us. <br />I think that some af the other witnesses have testified that that <br />may be dane in Mexico.. " <br /> <br />10. Clifford H. Stone testified for the treaty, and at page 1487 <br /> <br />et seq Senatar Dawney and he discussed the question of quality. Judge Stone <br /> <br />maintained there was no. implied guaranty that the water which was to (;0. to. <br /> <br />Mexico. had to. be usable. In fact the language of the treaty "forecloses any <br /> <br />such guaranty". Senatar Downey saught to. place the prablem on moral graunds, <br /> <br />i.e., it wauld be immoral to. force Mexico to take water that was unusable. To. <br /> <br />this Judge Stane replied that Mexico had people 'who understaad the problem <br /> <br />and still they were willing to accept the treaty withaut a guaranty of quality. <br /> <br />Judge Stane was emphatic an this paint because at page 1488 the fallawing <br /> <br />exchange taok place: <br /> <br />"Senatar DOWNEY. Judge Stone, wauld yau, as a citizen <br />af the United States, favar this treaty if yau believed that in <br />its practical warking aut it would give to Mexico. a very large <br />partian af her water that would be tatally unusable, and anather <br /> <br />B IS <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.