My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00291
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00291
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:13:35 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 9:37:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8278.400
Description
Title I - Mexican Treaty
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
3/1/1962
Author
IBWC
Title
Mexican Water Treaty -Appendix B - Water Quality A Missing
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />It shauld be painted aut that Tiptan did not accept Senatar Downey's <br /> <br />argument that the water would be unusable. He stated that it wauld be usable. <br /> <br />Thi,s was also. the statement of John R. Riter who testified on the quantities <br /> <br />of return flaw (See p. 356). <br /> <br />8. Senatar Downey questioned Mr. Lawsan when he returned to. the <br /> <br />stand an the quality problem at page 944. Lawson's position was: <br /> <br />(a) the water to be delivered from the All-American Canal could <br />modify other flow sa that the water wauld be usable. <br /> <br />(b) the treaty does not cantain any implied guaranty of usebie <br />water. <br /> <br />9. Mr. Tipton returned to the stand to testify for the treaty, and <br /> <br />during his testimany at pages 1282-3 made the fallowing explanatian af the <br /> <br />rea sans behind the scheduling provisian: <br /> <br />"One such item which is majar in character is the schedule <br />which is set up in the treaty, in arder that the United States may <br />receive credit far the majar partian if nat all af the return flaw <br />that will reach the stream below the last paint af diversian in <br />the United States. It was braught out very clearly by Mr. Dawd, <br />-a nd, 1-.t hi nk-it-w as-bra ug h t-o u t-d uring- th e s e-h ear.ings -tha t-th e-u s e <br />af water by Mexico. at present is nat parallel sa far as seasanal <br />distributian af use is concerned with the use in the United States. <br />Mexico. raises largely cattan. That requires much water in the <br />summertime--I do not mean much in quantity; cattan is nat a <br />large water-consuming pla:1t--I mean it takes a cansiderable <br />percentage of the total seasonal deli very in the manth af peak <br />demand. There is very little use af water in Mexico. during the <br />winter period. Nir. Dowd testified, and I agree, that the present <br />use by Mexico. of water is such that abaut 19 to 20 percent af <br />its total use is mude in the month af maximum use. During the <br />wintertime the use may drap dawn to. 1 percent of the total <br />seasonal use. On the other hand, the use by the Imperial irri- <br />gation district is such that in the month of maximum use anly <br />abaut 10 percent of the total annual amount is used, and the <br />minimum is 5 percent dunng the manth of minimum requirement. <br /> <br />B 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.